American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
Up to 1890 his work had hardly so much as suggested his later bent or
method. The “Head of a Boy” and “Sketch of a Boy,” shown in a recent
memorial exhibition at the Century Club, are both of them early efforts
done at Polling. They are in the dark Munich style of Duveneck and not
unlike things that Shirlaw and Chase were doing a few years earlier.
“Old Cole” in the same exhibition, done in 1881, again indicates Munich
teaching. The lights are surrounded by darks and the darks are darkened
by bitumen. There is no attempt at fine color or decorative pattern,
but rather a desire for the realistic largeness of the model with a
resultant brusque modelling and some dragging of a heavily loaded
brush. The portrait of “Thurlow Weed” gives a big strong head relieved
by being in high light and again surrounded by darks. One might think
from a casual glance that it had been inspired by Lenbach. The portrait
of “Jefferson as Bob Acres,” while it still shows Munich methods, is
something of a departure. It is a costume and footlight portrait with
the lights very high, the shadows pronounced, the color very gay. It
was well set, well drawn, easily painted upon ordinary canvas, and in
the usual oil medium. The portrait had spirit and life about it and
yet gave small indication of what Alexander’s style would ultimately
become. Just so with the rather fine portrait of “Walt Whitman,” now
in the Metropolitan Museum. The hark back to Lenbach in the insistent
relief of the head and hands as spots of white surrounded by dark is
quite apparent. Perhaps here there is a pose of the figure and a sweep
of the beard that suggest Alexander’s later swing and swirl of lines,
but it is not very marked.
This work, done for the most part before he was thirty, was talked
about and praised in New York art circles, but it was really Paris that
gave Alexander rank. He had been married in 1887 to Miss Elizabeth
Alexander, and in 1890 they went abroad for a few months that he might
recuperate from an attack of the grippe. They remained away eleven
years. The time was spent chiefly in Paris, and it was to the Société
Nationale des Beaux Arts that he sent, in 1893, three portraits that
made a decided hit. They were entitled “Portrait Gris,” “Portrait
Noir,” and “Portrait Jaune.” The titles suggest color schemes,
qualities of tone, garments arranged gracefully to fill space and
make a decorative pattern--in short, the things that thereafter gave
individuality to Alexander’s art. Paris immediately took notice of
them; the Société elected him an associate member, and the next year,
when he sent a panel of five portraits, he was elected a full member.
His reputation and his commissions from that time increased rapidly. He
was a success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account