American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
Almost all of his later pictures will be found to hinge upon color,
light, and atmosphere. He was very fond of moisture-laden air, rain
effects, clouds, rainbows, mists, vapors, fogs, smokes, hazes--all
phases of the atmosphere. In the same way he fancied dawns, dusks,
twilights, moonlights, sunbursts, flying shadows, clouded lights--all
phases of illumination. And again, he loved sunset colors, cloud
colors, sky colors, autumn tints, winter blues, spring grays, summer
greens--all phases of color. And these not for themselves alone, but
rather for the impression or effect that they produced. If he painted
a moonlight, it was with a great spread of silvery radiance, a hushed
effect in the trees, a still air, and the mystery of things half seen;
when he painted an early spring morning, he gave the vapor rising from
the ground, with dampness in the air, voyaging clouds, and a warming
blue in the sky; with an Indian summer afternoon there was the drowsy
hum of nature lost in dreamland and the indefinable regret of things
passing away. His “Rainy Day--Montclair” has the bend and droop of
foliage heavy with rain, the sense of saturation in earth and air, the
suggestion of the very smell of rain. The “Delaware Water Gap” shows
the drive of a storm down the valley, with the sweep of the wind felt
in the clouds, the trees, and the water. The “Summer Silence” is well
named, for again it gives that feeling of the hushed woods in July, the
deep shadows, the dense foliage that seems to sleep and softly breathe.
Always the impression--the feeling which he himself felt in the
presence of nature and tried to give back in form and color upon
canvas. I remember very well standing beside him before his “Niagara”
and hearing him say what interested him in that scene. It was not
so much the thundering mass of the waters, the volume and power,
the sublimity of the cataract, as the impression of clouds of mist
and vapor boiling up from the great caldron and being struck into
color-splendor by the sunlight. Only an Inness in the presence of
Niagara could have thrown emphasis upon so ethereal a phase as its
mists and color. They made the impression and he responded to it.
Every feature of landscape had its peculiar sentiment to him. He said
so many times and with no uncertain voice:
“Rivers, streams, the rippling brook, the hillside, the sky,
clouds--all things that we see--can convey sentiment if we are in
the love of God and the desire of truth. Some persons suppose that
landscape has no power of conveying human sentiment. But this is a
great mistake. The civilized landscape peculiarly can; and therefore I
love it more and think it more worthy of reproduction than that which
is savage and untamed. It is more significant.”
[Illustration: “Sunset at Montclair,” by George Inness.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account