American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
No wonder then with these conflicting individualities, and with all
traditions obsolete or unknown, there was no such thing as an American
school of painting at the Centennial Exhibition. The visitor in
Memorial Hall wandered hither and yon among the pictures and vainly
strove to grasp a consensus of art opinion or even an art tendency. The
exhibition was more or less of a hodgepodge. As a result both painter
and public went away in a somewhat bemuddled condition. Perhaps the
only thing about the exhibition that impressed one strongly was the
general incompetence and inconsequence of it.
Just at this time there entered upon the scene another generation,
a younger group of American painters. Many of them had seen the
exhibition at the Centennial and had, perhaps, been unwarrantably
influenced by it. They brought away from it a longing to paint; but
they realized that such art as that at Philadelphia was not what they
wished to produce, and if American teaching was responsible for it, so
much the worse for the teaching. They would have none of it. Once more
there was a sharp break with everything that might resemble a school
view or a school method. The younger group left the country and sought
instruction in European studios believing that nothing of good could
come out of the Nazareth of America.
Some of this later generation had gone abroad for study just before
1876. Shirlaw, Chase, and Duveneck were at Munich; Maynard, Minor,
and Millet at Antwerp; Blashfield, Bridgman, Beckwith, Thayer, Alden
Weir, Low, Wyatt Eaton at Paris. After 1876 the exodus was greater
and Paris was the goal. A few years later some of these students were
homeward bound, having finished a more or less advanced course of
instruction under competent masters. They immediately set up studios
in New York, and, with the enthusiasm and assurance of youth, began to
impart information to the effect that the only painting of importance
was that of Europe. As for the native American art, it was not worth
reckoning with. The Academy of Design was merely the abiding-place
of the ossified, and, of course, it would be surrendered on the
demand of the younger men. But the Academy, after a battle of words,
declined to give up the fort, and a little later declined even to hang
some of the pictures of the gifted. This was regarded as unspeakably
outrageous, and swift action followed. In 1877 there was a call for
the establishment of a new art body, and out of it came the Society of
American Artists, with twenty-two initial members.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account