American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
All through the sixties this misapprehension of purpose and aim
persisted, and toward 1870 another riddle was presented with the
appearance of the nocturnes. They were things done along the Thames at
dusk and were revelations of that blue-air envelope which forms when
the shadow of the world begins to creep up the Eastern sky. The idea
had perhaps been suggested to Whistler in the color prints of Hiroshige
and he had afterward found its reality in English twilights. Such a
motive was quite the opposite of Turner’s blazing sunset upon which the
generations had been reared. Everything was muffled, vague in outline,
half seen as to place. Much was left to the imagination, and as for
the composition, it was arranged with the greatest simplicity. Indeed,
it was so simple that people thought it must be foolish and said so
without hesitation.
Again the subtitles of “Blue and Gold” and “Black and Gold” carried no
meaning. Even the experienced Ruskin could see nothing in the later
“Falling Rocket” but “a coxcomb flinging a pot of paint in the public’s
face.” It was “cockney impudence” and “wilful imposture.” That was more
than Whistler could stand, and he began a libel suit against Ruskin in
the course of which the Attorney-General of England said he “did not
know when so much amusement had been afforded the British public as
by Mr. Whistler’s pictures.” The trial was a farce and the laugh went
against Whistler. But he laughs best who laughs last, and it has not
been the British public that has done the latest laughing.
There had been merriment before that, and--incredible as it may
seem--over Whistler’s now celebrated portrait of his mother. It
was admitted to the Royal Academy Exhibition of 1872 only after a
well-known academician had threatened to resign if it were rejected.
It was not wanted, but having been received, it was treated as a joke.
London revised its opinion about the portrait later on. After the
French Government bought it for the Luxembourg it was thought, even by
the hosts of Philistia, to be Whistler’s best effort, and there was
much talk of its refined motherly spirit and decent air--praises that
the painter resented, telling the public that the sitter was no affair
of theirs and that their only interest should be in “the arrangement in
gray and black.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account