American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent — John Shaqi
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
Every writer in America knows that present-day American literature,
with some precious exceptions, does not reach up to contemporary
English literature; that poetry or romance or criticism with us has
not the form, the substance, or the technical accomplishment of the
same work in France. Every architect in America must realize that
with all the get-learned-quick of his foreign study, with all his
appropriations from the Gothic or the Renaissance or the Georgian,
with all his cleverness in solving business needs and doing building
stunts under peculiar circumstances, there is something lacking in
his productions; that they are not so monumental as he could wish
for; that they are not firm set in the ground and do not belong to
the soil and remain a part of the land and the people in the sense of
contemporary French or even English architecture. Every musician with
us must have a similar feeling about our music. As with architecture
and painting, there have been some remarkable compositions put forth by
our composers. Europe compliments us by playing them and nods approval
at the endeavor, but again they do not reach up to corresponding work
in Paris or Berlin or Munich. Why not? Have we not as good brains and
fiddles in New York as in Vienna? What is it we lack?
Surely we are not wanting in energy, in resource, in materials. Is it
perhaps the restraint of these that we need? Time and patience are
very necessary factors in all of the arts. Attitude of mind, a sense
of proportion--a style, in short--cannot be attained in a few years
of schooling. To the training of a lifetime must be added a something
that has been more or less inherited. That something handed down from
father to son, from master to pupil, from generation to generation,
is what I have called tradition. It is not technique alone, but a
mental outlook, added to the body of belief and experience of those
who have gone before. The skilled hand of a Kreisler, a Sargent, a
MacMonnies is perhaps possible of attainment in a decade, but the
mental attitude--its poise and its restraint--is that something which
is inherited as taste, and many decades may go to its formation. In
this latter respect, perhaps, Kreisler has had the advantage of both
Sargent and MacMonnies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account