American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The federal constitution is the result of the labors of a convention
called at Philadelphia in May, 1787, at a time when it was feared by
many that the Union was in the greatest danger, from inability to pay
soldiers who had, in 1783, been disbanded on a declaration of peace and
an acknowledgment of independence; from prostration of the public credit
and faith of the nation; from the neglect to provide for the payment of
even the interest on the public debt; and from the disappointed hopes of
many who thought freedom did not need to face responsibilities. A large
portion of the convention of 1787 still clung to the confederacy of the
states, and advocated as a substitute for the constitution a revival of
the old articles of confederation with additional powers to Congress. A
long discussion followed, and a most able one, but a constitution for
the people, embodying a division of legislative, judicial and executive
powers prevailed, and the result is now daily witnessed in the federal
constitution. While the revolutionary war lasted but seven years, the
political revolution incident to, identified with and directing it,
lasted thirteen years. This was completed on the 30th of April, 1789,
the day on which Washington was inaugurated as the first President under
the federal constitution.
The Particularists.
As questions of government were evolved by the struggles for
independence, the Whigs, who of course greatly outnumbered all others
during the Revolution, naturally divided in sentiment, though their
divisions were not sufficiently serious to excite the establishment of
rival parties—something which the great majority of our forefathers were
too wise to think of in time of war. When the war closed, however, and
the question of establishing the Union was brought clear to the view of
all, one class of the Whigs believed that state government should be
supreme, and that no central power should have sufficient authority to
coerce a state, or keep it to the compact against its will. All accepted
the idea of a central government; all realized the necessity of union,
but the fear that the states would lose their power, or surrender their
independence was very great, and this fear was more naturally shown by
both the larger and the smaller states. This class of thinkers were then
called Particularists. Their views were opposed by the
Strong Government Whigs
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account