American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Douglas promptly accepted the challenge, and it was arranged that there
should be seven joint debates, each alternately opening and closing, the
opening speech to occupy one hour, the reply one hour and a half, and
the closing half an hour. They spoke at Ottawa, August 21st; Freeport,
August 27th; Jonesboro’, September 15th; Charleston, September 18th;
Galesburg, October 7th; Quincy, October 13th; and Alton, October 15th.
We give in Book III of this volume their closing speeches in full.
Great crowds attended, and some of the more enterprising daily journals
gave phonographic reports of the speeches. The enthusiasm of the North
soon ran in Lincoln’s favor, though Douglas had hosts of friends; but
then the growing and the aggressive party was the Republican, and even
the novelty of a new and attractive doctrine like that of “popular
sovereignty” could not long divert their attention. The prize suspended
in view of the combatants was the United States Senatorship, and to
close political observers this was plainly within the grasp of Douglas
by reason of an apportionment which would give his party a majority in
the Legislature, even though the popular majority should be twenty
thousand against him—a system of apportionment, by the way, not confined
to Illinois alone, or not peculiar to it in the work of any of the great
parties at any period when party lines were drawn.
Buchanan closely watched the fight, and it was charged and is still
believed by the friends of the “Little Giant,” that the administration
secretly employed its patronage and power to defeat him. Certain it is
that a few prominent Democrats deserted the standard of Douglas, and
that some of them were rewarded. In the heat of the battle, however,
Douglas’ friends were careless of the views of the administration. He
was a greater leader than Buchanan, and in Illinois at least he
overshadowed the administration. He lacked neither money nor friends.
Special trains of cars, banners, cannon, bands, processions, were all
supplied with lavish hands. The democracy of Illinois, nor yet of any
other State, ever did so well before or since, and if the administration
had been with him this enthusiasm might have spread to all other States
and given his doctrine a larger and more glorious life. Only the border
States of the South, however, saw opportunity and glory in it, while the
office-holders in other sections stood off and awaited results.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account