American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
of the war.’ The friend to whom this was said inquired, ‘What
justification for all this?’ Douglas replied, ‘There is no
justification, nor any pretense of any—if they remain in the Union, I
will go as far as the Constitution will permit, to maintain their just
rights, and I do not doubt a majority of Congress would do the same.
But,’ said he, again rising on his feet, and extending his arm, ‘if the
Southern States attempt to secede from this Union, without further
cause, I am in favor of their having just so many slaves, and just so
much slave territory, as they can hold at the point of the bayonet, and
NO MORE.’”
In the border states of Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee
and Missouri there were sharp political contests between the friends of
secession and of the Union. Ultimately the Unionists triumphed in
Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri—in the latter state by the active aid of
U. S. troops—in Maryland and Kentucky by military orders to arrest any
members of the Legislature conspiring to take their states out. In
Tennessee, the Union men, under the lead of Andrew Johnson, Governor
(“Parson”) Brownlow, Horace Maynard and others, who made a most gallant
fight to keep the state in, and they had the sympathy of the majority of
the people of East Tennessee. The Secessionists took Virginia out April
17th, and North Carolina May 20th. The leading Southerners encouraged
the timid and hesitating by saying the North would not make war; that
the political divisions would be too great there, and they were
supported in this view by the speeches and letters of leaders like
Clement L. Vallandigham. On the other hand they roused the excitable by
warlike preparations, and, as we have stated, to prevent reconsideration
on the part of those who had seceded, resolved to fire upon Sumter.
Beauregard acted under direct instructions from the government at
Montgomery when he notified Major Anderson on the 11th of April to
surrender Fort Sumter. Anderson replied that he would evacuate on the
15th, but the original summons called for surrender by the 12th, and
they opened their fire in advance of the time fixed for evacuation—a
fact which clearly established the purpose to bring about a collision.
It was this aggressive spirit which aroused and united the North, and
made extensive political division therein impossible.
The Southern leaders, ever anxious for the active aid of the Border
States, soon saw that they could only acquire it through higher
sectional excitement than any yet cultivated, and they acted
accordingly. Roger A. Pryor, in a speech at Richmond April 10th, gave
expression to this thought, when he said in response to a serenade:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account