American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The second election of Monroe, in 1820, was accomplished without a
contest. Out of 231 electoral votes, but one was cast against him, and
that for John Quincy Adams. Mr. Tompkins, the candidate for
Vice-President, was only a little less fortunate, there being 14
scattering votes against him. Neither party, if indeed there was a
Federalist party left made any nominations.
The Missouri Compromise.
The second session of the 17th Congress opened on the 4th day of March,
1820, with James Monroe at the head of the Executive Department of the
Government, and the Democratic party in the majority in both branches of
the Federal Legislature. The Cabinet at that time was composed of the
most brilliant minds of the country, indeed as most justly remarked by
Senator Thomas H. Benton in his published review of the events of that
period, it would be difficult to find in any government, in any country,
at any time, more talent and experience, more dignity and decorum, more
purity of private life, a larger mass of information, and more addiction
to business, than was comprised in the list of celebrated names then
constituting the executive department of the government. The legislative
department was equally impressive. The exciting and agitating question
then pending before Congress was on the admission of the State of
Missouri into the Federal Union, the subject of the issue being the
attempted tacking on of conditions restricting slavery within her
limits. She was admitted without conditions under the so-called
compromise, which abolished it in certain portions of the then province
of Louisiana. In this controversy, the compromise was sustained and
carried entirely by the Democratic Senators and members from the
Southern and slaveholding States aided and sanctioned by the Executive,
and it was opposed by fifteen Senators from non-slaveholding States, who
represented the opposite side on the political questions of the day. It
passed the House by a close vote of 86 to 82. It has been seriously
questioned since whether this act was constitutional. The real struggle
was political, and for the balance of power. For a while it threatened
the total overthrow of all political parties upon principle, and the
substitution of geographical parties discriminated by the slave line,
and thus destroying the proper action of the Federal government, and
leading to a separation of the States. It was a federal movement,
accruing to the benefit of that party, and at first carried all the
Northern democracy in its current, giving the supremacy to their
adversaries. When this effect was perceived, democrats from the northern
non-slaveholding States took early opportunity to prevent their own
overthrow, by voting for the admission of the States on any terms, and
thus prevent the eventual separation of the States in the establishment
of geographical parties divided by a slavery and anti-slavery line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account