The bones of _birds_, like those of the deer, were almost without
exception broken, but in quite a different manner. In the latter it was
the shaft that was shattered, the ends often remaining uninjured; while
in the birds the shaft was whole, and the ends not only broken off, but
nowhere to be found. It is not to be supposed that they were so broken
off for the extraction of the marrow, since those containing only air
were treated in the same way. Steenstrup having observed the same fact
in the remains from the Danish shell-heaps, suspected that they were
mutilated by dogs, and accordingly by way of experiment, having kept
some of these animals on short diet, gave them various bird bones to
eat. He found, as he had anticipated, that they ate the ends, rejecting
the shaft. He explains their choice by the greater sponginess, and
easier digestibility of the former as compared with the dense middle
portion of the latter. No doubt an additional inducement was found in
the remains of flesh, tendon, and ligament, which would usually remain
adherent to the ends, after the portions ordinarily eaten had been
removed. On looking over the specimens of our collections, marks of
teeth of animals were frequently noticed, some of them of such size as
might be made by dogs, but others by a much smaller animal, as a cat or
mink.
Of the remains of birds, by far the most interesting are those of
the Great Auk (_Alca impennis_), which formerly had a much wider
geographical distribution than now, for having followed the glaciers in
their retreat, at present it is confined to the arctic and subarctic
regions. In Europe it formerly existed, as appears from the evidence
of the shell-heaps, on the shores of Scotland, the Orkneys, and it
has recently died out in Iceland. In the United States we have the
authority of Steenstrup and Prof. Baird for its former existence as
far south as Cape Cod. There can be but little doubt that the last
survivors lingered till after the arrival of the Europeans. The
description of the “Wobble,” by Josslyn, as far as it goes, applies
to the Great Auk, “an ill-shaped bird, having no long feathers in
their pinions which is the reason they cannot fly; not much unlike a
penguin.”[12]
There are various traditions along the sea-coast of its having been
seen at a much later date. Audubon, however, in his voyage to Labrador
saw none in the Straits of Belle Isle, but was told that they still
bred on an island north of Newfoundland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account