Græco, Latinum interpretem sequutus scripsit, “ne quoque finis insisteret.” Eodem cap. n. 4. refert Irenæus, quod Pater per Monogenem emiserit Horon in imagine sua, ἀσύζυγον, ἀθήλυντον: ubi interpres perperam legens ἀσυζύγῳ, ἀθηλύντῳ, vel, ut alii volunt, ἀῥῥενοθήλει, perperam et vertit, “sine conjuge masculo‐fœmina.” Eadem culpa tenetur et Tertullianus, cap. cit. “Pater per Monogenem Nun, quem supra diximus Horon, in hæc promit in imagine sua fœmina‐ mare.” Nempe uterque id ad imaginem refert, quod Horo soli convenire posse recta ratio demonstrat. Culpam hanc non sustineret Tertullianus, si textum Græcum hic potius quam interpretem consuluisset. Paulo post, Sophian ab Horo mundatam et confirmatam, ac suæ restitutam conjugationi cum dixisset Irenæus, addit: Χωρισθείσης γὰρ τῆς ἐνθυμήσεως ἀπ᾽ αὐτῆς σὺν τῷ ἐπιγινομένῳ πάθει, αὐτὴν μὲν ἐντὸς Πληρώματος μεῖναι· τὴν δὲ ἐνθύμησιν αὐτῆς σὺν τῷ πάθει ὑπὸ τοῦ Ὅρου ἀφορισθῆναι καὶ ἀποσταυρωθῆναι. Quæ sic reddidit interpres: “Separata enim intentione ab ea, cum appendice passione, ipsam quidem infra Pleroma perseverasse: concupiscentiam vero ejus cum passione ab Horo separatam, et crucifixam, et extra cum factam esse, &c.” ubi duo peccat, primum quod, σὺν τῷ ἐπιγινομένῳ πάθει, vertit, “cum appendice passione;” vertendum erat, “cum passione quæ supervenerat.” Secundum, quod ἀποσταυρωθῆναι vertit, “crucifixam;” hic significat, quasi “vallo cinctam et disjunctam” a Pleromate. Eadem omnino peccat et Tertullianus, scribens: “Enthymesin ejus et illam appendicem passionem ab Horo relegatam et crucifixam.” Hæc et plura alia, quæ identidem in notis observavi, invicte, ni fallor, probant, Tertullianum, ut Græcum Irenæum legerit, (quod non nego) ab eo tamen sæpe defecisse, ut Latini interpretis, et quidem interdum errantis, vestigia sectaretur. 81 _Contra Julianum Pelagianum_, I. c. 3. he has quoted the last clause of IV. ii. 7; and c. 7. the last paragraph of V. xvii. 1. 82 Eusebius indeed says (V. xxiii. 1) that the Churches of _all Asia_ were united in differing from the rest of the world; but it is evident, from chap. xxv. that he means Asia Minor; for he mentions the bishops of Jerusalem, Cæsarea, Tyre, and Ptolemais, as asserting that the Church of Alexandria agreed with them in their present practice, which was the same as that of the West.