An address to British females on the moral management of pregnancy and labour, and some cursory observations on medical deportment : $b Suggested by the death of Her Royal Highness Princess Charlotte Augusta of Wales: with a vindication of Her Royal Highness's physicians, Sir Richard Croft, Dr. Baillie, and Dr. SimsCooke, William
History
An address to British females on the moral management of pregnancy and labour, and some cursory observations on medical deportment : $b Suggested by the death of Her Royal Highness Princess Charlotte Augusta of Wales: with a vindication of Her Royal Highness's physicians, Sir Richard Croft, Dr. Baillie, and Dr. Sims
Cooke, William
Baillie, Matthew, 1761-1823; Charlotte Augusta, Princess of Great Britain, 1796-1817 -- Death and burial; Croft, Richard, Sir, 1762-1818; Labor (Obstetrics); Obstetrics; Pregnancy -- Complications; Prenatal care; Sims, John, 1749-1831
There are others also, who seem to think it honorable to be eccentric;
and, to increase the anomaly, have chosen an eccentricity, which
ordinarily is esteemed disgusting. Abruptness, rudeness, insensibility,
coarseness of manner, vulgarity, or obsequiousness, may be found in
men, whose minds are far superior to mediocrity; and although nature or
education might have been somewhat defective, it is not difficult to
recognise the features of some pernicious habit. We have seen striking
indications of disregard to human suffering in our hospitals; and often
has it called forth a disgusting expression of risibility amongst the
students. Painful, indeed, is it to observe the mistaken excellence
attached to an apparent disregard of human suffering: it seems to be
thought, that there is something philosophical in conquering the common
sympathies of human life, although it is by them society is cemented.
Although no personal graces―no urbanity―no kindness, can be
substituted for unremitting study, and discriminating observation, yet
it is practicable to adopt a deportment equally remote from pliancy and
barbarity.
For what beneficial end, many will exclaim, are these observations
made? and had I not drawn for myself the line of demarcation, I
would gladly meet the inquiry in an attempt to prove that some men
of superior knowledge, and of eminent rank, would have greatly
extended their benefits to human nature had not their manners been
repulsive:―that the extraneous habits of these men are borrowed, by
an aspiring race of students, who appear in plumes of fancied beauty;
whose affected air justifies the suspicion that the art of medicine
is not _merely_ conjectural:―and that by ingenuousness, candour,
kindness, and an attentive regard to mental phenomena, united certainly
with a competency of knowledge, not only the honor of the profession
is enhanced, but its utility promoted. If there are no diseases of
mind independently of body, which we are willing to admit, the
influence of mind on body must be allowed. The popular belief in the
salutary influence of _faith_, is well founded―the opposite feeling
of _distrust_, will act perniciously. The man whose mind is properly
furnished will dexterously seize occasions of alleviating distress,
which another, who may be almost exclusively watching for diseased
structure, would not easily comprehend.[2]
An attempt to make chronic cases of disease subservient to any
mercenary purpose, is an entire perversion of the liberal dictates of
science; and often renders the most assiduous exertions unavailing.
Where there is scarcely sufficient disease to impose bodily
restriction, it cannot be expected that protracted courses of medicine
can be endured, unless it be administered in the most simple and
unobjectionable form. Nevertheless, it is a duty to subdue chronic
diseases; and often it can only be done by a persevering management of
diet, aided by medicine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account