An Almond for a Parrot: Being a reply to Martin Mar-Prelate.
Religion
An Almond for a Parrot: Being a reply to Martin Mar-Prelate.
Marprelate controversy
Cheese in his studie, besides apples and nuttes, although his wife can
neuer come at them. I hearde not long since of a stoute conference hee
had with a yong scholer, who taking my Deske-man somewhat tardie in his
disputations, told him hee was inspired with too much Logique. Where vnto
hee replyed with this solempne protestatiō, I thank God, al the world
cannot accuse me of that arte. I hope anon maister _Martin_, I shall bee
meetelie euen with you for your knauerie, if I goe but two mile further
in your Ministrie. It is not the Primitiue Church shall beare out the
Vicar of little _Down._ in Norfolke, in groaping his owne hennes, like a
Cotqueane, I am to come ouer him when I have more leasure, for his tenne
shillings Sermons at Thetforde: wherein if he raue as hee was wont to
doe, Ile make him wishe that hee had been still Vsher of Westminister.
Well, to the purpose. You saie Bishoppes are no Magistrates, because
they are no lawfull Magistrates. Is it euen so brother _Timothie_,
will it neuer be better, must I euer leade you vp and downe antiquitie
by the nose lyke an Asse. May neither Scriptures nor Fathers goe for
paiment with you, but still you will bee reducing vs to the president
of the persecuted Church, and so confounde the discipline of warre and
peace? If you will needes make vs the apes of all their extremities,
why doe not you vrge the vse of that communitie wherein _Ananias_ and
_Saphira_ were vnfaythfull. Perswade Noble men and Gentlemen to sell
theyr landes, and laie the money at your feete, take awaie the title of
mine and thine from amongst vs, and let the worlde knowe you heereafter
by the name of Anabaptistes. Admit that the authoritie of Bishoppes were
as vnlawfull as you woulde make it, yet since it is imposed vnto them
by the Princes owne mouth, and ratified by the approbation of so many
Kings and Emperours, as well in their particular Parliamentes as generall
counsayles, you are bounde in conscience to reuerence it, and in all
humilitie to regarde it, insomuch as Christ denide not tribute to _Cæsar_
an vsurper, nor appealde from _Pilate_ a Pagan, who occupied that place
by the intrusion of tyrannie. Were the Israelites in captiuitie, anie
whit exempted from the obedience of subiectes, in that they liued vnder
the scepter of _Nabuchodonesor_ an Idolater, who had blasphemed their
God, defaced their Temple, and defiled their holie vesselles. Nay, are
they not expresslie commaunded by the Lordes owne mouth, to honour him as
their King: Howe can they then escape the dampnation of contempte, that
beeing priuate subiectes to such a vertuous Soueraigne, as is zealous of
Gods glorie will controll her, disposing of honours, and oppose vnto
publique derision, those the especiall pillers and ornamentes of her
state, whome shee hath graced from their infancie, with so many sundrie
ascentes of dignities. But were this all, then shoulde not treason
bee such a braunche of your religion as it is. Haue not you and your
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account