Laundresses -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
“And my chain,” says Lord Southwold, touching a steel one, “was my poor
old Hector’s collar, and I wear it in memory of him. How he’d thresh
out five acres of turnips before luncheon! We shall never see his
like.”
Bertram grows impatient: “Individually you may wear Waterburys or
dog-collars, but each is nevertheless a symbol of inequality between
you and the man in the street, who is obliged to look at the church
clock to see the hour at which he may seek the parish dole.”
“What profound philosophy!” cries Southwold. “What crimes one may
commit without knowing it!”
“If a watch be an unwholesome sign of a bloated aristocracy, pray, Mr.
Bertram, what are our jewels?” asks a very pretty woman, Lady Jane
Rivaux.
“There are no words strong enough,” replies Bertram, “to condemn the
use of gems, whether from a moral or an æsthetic point of view. In a
purified condition of society they would of course become impossible
abominations.”
The ladies present are too horrified to speak; Jane Rivaux, alone,
recovering her first shock of surprise at such a blasphemy, asks, with
vivacity:
“But all the people you would throw out of employment? The people who
dig for jewels, don’t they dig? The people who polish them, and cut
them, and set them, and deal in them; the people who make the iron
safes, and the patent locks, you would throw them all out of work?
Surely that wouldn’t be doing any good? What would become of the miners
and lapidaries and jewellers and all the rest?”
Bertram smiles with pitying disdain.
“Oh, my dear Lady Jane, your kind of reasoning is as old as the hills,
and carries its own refutation with it. All those workmen and tradesmen
would be liberated from labours which now degrade them, and would thus
be set free for higher work--work worthy of being illumined by the
light of reason.”
“What work? Would they be all schoolmasters and governesses? Or all
authors and artists?”
“What work? Such work as the Community might organise and distribute,
such work as might be needful for the general good. When every one
will work, every one will have leisure. The poet will mow the meadow
in the morning and compose his eclogues in the afternoon. The painter
will fell trees at dawn and at noon paint his landscapes in the forest.
The sculptor will hew coal in the bowels of the earth for a few hours
and come to the upper air to carve the marble and mould the clay. The
author will guide the plough or plant the potato-patch at sunrise and
will have the rest of the day free to write his novel or study his
essay----”
“Humph!” says Southwold, ruffling his short grey hair in perplexity.
“The precise use of wasting Sir Frederic Leighton’s time on a seam
of coal, and Mr. Swinburne’s on a mowing machine, I don’t exactly
perceive. However----”
“Pierre Loti is your ideal, then,” says Cicely Seymour. “He ‘has gone
down to the deep in ships’ before he writes of sea life.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account