“The great fact in the apostle’s mind was, that God regards and
treats all men, from the first moment of their existence, as out
of fellowship with himself, as having forfeited his favor. Instead
of entering into communion with them the moment they begin to
exist (as he did with Adam), and forming them by his Spirit in his
own moral image, he regards them as out of his favor, and
withholds the influences of the Spirit. Why is this? Why does God
thus deal with the human race? Here is a form of death which the
violation of the law of Moses, the transgression of the law of
nature, the existence of innate depravity, separately or combined,
are insufficient to account for. Its infliction is antecedent to
them all; and yet it is of all evils the essence and the sum. Men
begin to exist out of communion with God. This is the fact which
no sophistry can get out of the Bible or the history of the world.
Paul tells us why it is. It is because we fell in Adam; it is for
the offense of one man that all thus die. The covenant being
formed with Adam, not only for himself but also for his
posterity—in other words, Adam having being placed on trial, not
for himself only, but also for his race, his act was, in virtue of
this relation, REGARDED AS OUR ACT.
“God withdrew from us as he did from him; in consequence of this
withdrawal, we begin to exist in moral darkness, destitute of a
disposition to delight in God, and prone to delight in ourselves
and the world. The sin of Adam, therefore, ruined us; was the
ground of the withdrawing of the divine favor from the whole race.
But such evil was inflicted before the giving of the Mosaic law;
it comes on men before the transgression of the law of nature, or
even the existence of inherent depravity. It must, therefore, be
for the offense of one man that judgment has come upon all men to
condemnation.”
Constitutional Transmission Mode.
Dr. Dwight’s system of theology is regarded as the fairest exhibition of
the theological opinions of the majority of the New England Congregational
clergy.
While the Catholic mode, as taught by Dr. Woods so many years at Andover,
is probably adopted by many, the views of Dr. Dwight, and his successor,
Dr. Taylor, on the point under consideration, are taught now both at the
Andover and New Haven seminaries, and probably are adopted by the great
majority of the clergy in the Congregational and New School Presbyterian
denominations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account