“ ‘Is not the Creator the author of the constitution of mind?
“ ‘If the Creator _had power_ to make it right and yet has made it
wrong, is he not proved by _his works_ (the only mode of learning
his character) to be unwise and malevolent, and is not a
_reliable_ revelation from such a being, to teach the way of
virtue and happiness, impossible?
“ ‘Do you not claim that the Bible teaches that God _has proved_
his power to make mind perfect by creating angels and Adam with
_perfect minds_, and at the same time, as a penalty for the sin of
the first parent, has made such a constitution of things, that
every human mind comes into existence with a ruined and depraved
nature, that never _can_, or never _will_, act right till God re‐
creates it, while as yet, for the great mass of mankind, he never
remedies this wrong?
“ ‘Do you not claim that the Bible teaches that no human being has
any right and acceptable feelings or actions till God thus re‐
creates the mind?
“ ‘If the Bible _does_ teach thus, we can find a nobler Creator
and more perfect system of religion by the light of nature without
any revelation at all, while the God of the Bible, by its own
showing, is _proved_ unworthy of confidence as a teacher of the
way to virtue and happiness.’
“Pressed by these questions, I have searched the Bible in vain to
find any such doctrines in its pages. I find nothing of the kind,
and so I acknowledge that I have been in the wrong, and relinquish
the Augustinian dogma in which I have been educated, as
unsupported either by reason or revelation; and first privately
and then publicly ask for _any evidence_ to sustain it.
“I come before the public, not as a teacher of metaphysics or
theology, but as an _inquirer_ for the truth. I state, as nearly
as I am able, the difficulties I have met, and take every possible
method to avoid mistake and misrepresentation in regard to the
opinions of both those with whom I agree and those from whom I
differ.
“I assume that theology is capable of improvement; that Protestant
divines are no more infallible than Catholic; that a humble and
teachable spirit is the distinctive mark of a Christian teacher;
and that the courage and manliness that can acknowledge mistakes
is not only more Christian, but even in the eye of the world, is
more honorable and dignified than any assumption of infallibility,
however well sustained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account