“They maintain that ‘man, _after_ the fall of Adam, was as truly
created in God’s image as was Adam; that Christ was tempted in all
points like as we are; that the stronger are our inferior
propensities, if we govern them, as we can, by the morally right
act of the will, the greater is the moral excellence of the act.
They do not maintain that man has full power to _change_ his
depraved nature without divine aid, for they have never supposed
he has a depraved nature _in any sense_, or a corrupt nature, much
less a sinful nature, to be changed; but rather that _in nature_
he is like God. In discussions, they have always opposed the use
of language by my father and Mr. Barnes of a corrupt nature, not
sinful.’
“I present this as an exact statement of my own views, and I claim
that, on the point of the native character of the human mind, it
is the _Pelagian_ ground in opposition to the _Augustinian_, and
that no _third_ ground is possible. If I am wrong in either
particular, I ask to be enlightened by the editors of the
Independent, and by the New Haven divines themselves. I claim also
that, so far as I can see, this is the _only_ ground on which the
argument above stated, as that of ‘Young America,’ can be
successfully met.
“I understand the editors of the Independent that they occupy the
Augustinian ground, and I therefore appeal to them, as well as to
the theologians of Princeton, Andover, Union, and Lane, to
instruct me and the public _wherein_ I have misstated their views,
and above all, to instruct us how, with this dogma fastened to it,
the Bible can be sustained against the above infidel argument. In
reference to this, should any thing be attempted, I offer these
questions for attention:
“Is there any passage in the Bible that teaches that the minds of
the angels or of Adam were not made exactly like those of the
descendants of Adam, and subjected to the same slow and gradual
process of acquisition and development?
“I have looked and inquired in vain to find any such passage, or
to find any person who ever found one.
“Is there any passage in the Bible that teaches that the _nature_
or constitution of the mind of man is not _the best that is
possible in the nature of things_? I have never been able to find
any.
“Is there any passage in the Bible that teaches that man has
received a _ruined nature in consequence of Adam’s sin_?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account