An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supplyBeadnell, H. J. L. (Hugh John Llewellyn)
History
An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supply
A closer examination, however, will show that there is in reality
a difference in level of more than 200 metres between the same beds
on either side of the oasis; for the beds capping Jebel Tarif belong
to the White Chalk of the Cretaceous system, and are therefore very
much older than those of Eocene age forming the eastern plateau
(see map and section). This great difference in vertical position
is due partly to a steady dip from west to east, partly to a
remarkable longitudinal flexure running north and south through
the centre of the depression, and partly to a gentle fold near the
base of the eastern escarpment. Along the actual line of flexure,
which passes through Jebel Têr, Jebel Tarwan, Nadûra, Gorn el
Gennâh, and Gertuma (S.S.E. of Bulaq), the different rock-stages
are folded and fractured to a remarkable degree. Throughout the
greater part of its course the flexure approximates to the type of
disturbance known as a simple monocline, but in places, as in Jebel
Têr, it passes into a syncline bounded by nearly vertical faults;
while in others the beds are bent into almost symmetrical basins or
centroclinal folds, typical examples of these structures being met
with at points 6 kilometres south of Kharga village and 2 kilometres
south-west of Qasr Zaiyan.
The importance of this line of folding and faulting must not be lost
sight of, as although the dislocations produced are only actually
visible in the case of the exposed upper beds of the oasis sequence,
the earth-movements to which it owes its origin have had similar
disturbing effects on the underlying and hidden water-bearing
strata. Ball reported that the most striking evidence of faulting
was between Jebel Têr and Jebel Tarif, and showed the fault as
running for a short distance in a N.N.E. and S.S.W. direction, but,
as already mentioned, the line of disturbance is coincident with
the longer axis of the former range, so that the majority of the
wells are on the west or upthrow side of the fault. The effects of
this faulting and folding on the underground water-supply will be
further alluded to in a later chapter.
In the early summer of this year (1908) I followed the line of
flexure southwards in order to determine whether it continued
throughout the oasis. As far as the small eminence of Gala, about
10 kilometres south of Bulaq, it ran in an almost straight line,
but south of that point its course took a distinct bend to the
west, so that the fold was very soon lost in the great belt of
sand-dunes. Beyond this point its continuation could, however, be
inferred by occasional exposures of steeply inclined sandstones,
the most southerly point to which it was actually traced being
in latitude 24° 55′ N., about 15 kilometres S.S.W. of Ain Girm
Meshîm.
[Illustration: GEOLOGICAL SECTION ACROSS THE OASIS FROM JEBEL TARIF
TO THE EASTERN ESCARPMENT.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account