An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of SevilleBrehaut, Ernest
History
An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of Seville
Brehaut, Ernest
Isidore, of Seville, Saint, -636; Thesis (Ph. D.)
3. _Res_ is derived from possessing rightly (_recte_); _jus_ from
possessing justly (_juste_).... What is wickedly possessed is not the
owner’s. He possesses wickedly who uses his own wickedly or takes
possession of another’s.... He who is captured by greed is possessed,
not possessing.
4. _Bona_ belong to the honorable or noble, and they are called
_bona_ so that they may not have a base use but men may use them for
good things.
5. _Peculium_ belongs properly to minors or slaves. For _peculium_ is
that which the father or master allows his son or slave to treat as
his own....
ON TIMES[299]
[299] In his “On Times,” Isidore is apparently condensing what
he has written elsewhere. The first part of it, which gives an
account of the divisions of time—the moment, hour, day, week,
month, year, and so forth—is drawn from _De Natura Rerum_,
which in turn was based on Suetonius, Solinus, Hyginus, of the
heathen writers, and Ambrosius, Clement, and Augustine, of the
Christian. (See p. 46.) In the second part, which consists of a
brief chronology, Isidore condensed his _Chronicon_, which was
drawn from Eusebius as translated and modified by Jerome, and
supplemented by the later work of Prosper, Victor Tunnensis, and
Joannis Biclarensis. The sources of the _Chronicon_ have been
thoroughly discussed by H. Hertzberg, _Ueber die Chronicon des
Isidors von Sevilla_ in _Forschungen zur Deutschen Geschichte_
(Göttingen, 1875), vol. xv.
INTRODUCTION
To the early and medieval Christian chronology was a subject of
absorbing interest. For him the course of the world’s history was
authoritatively laid down in the Biblical account, and looking back
over it he thought he saw that it was passing by well-marked stages
to an end that was to be as sharply defined as its beginning had
been. It was inevitable that there should be an attempt to plot its
progress and even to form some general notion as to its end. For
this purpose the Greek chronology was accepted in its entirety and
extended by a set of extravagant assumptions, acceptable to the
uncritical minds of the time, back to the beginning of the world. By
this means an authoritative chronological exposition of past time
was secured, such as under wise interpretation would disclose more
clearly the rate and manner in which God’s purpose was working itself
out.[300]
[300] At the same time chronology was incidentally made to show
in a statistical way what a great priority Hebrew civilization
had over its pagan rivals. _Cf._ pp. 79, 80.
The chronology presented by Isidore traces the course of time along
the line of the Roman emperors from Heraclius back to Julius Caesar,
and then by way of the Ptolemaic dynasty to Alexander the Great. Here
a transition is made to the Persian kings, who are followed back to
Darius near the beginning of the fifth age. The four ages between
the captivity of the Jews and the creation are marked by Biblical
personages only.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account