An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of SevilleBrehaut, Ernest
History
An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of Seville
Brehaut, Ernest
Isidore, of Seville, Saint, -636; Thesis (Ph. D.)
I. Definition (ch. 1).
II. Chief writers (ch. 2).
III. Divisions (ch. 3).
1. _Inventio._
2. _Dispositio._
3. _Elocutio._
4. _Memoria._
5. _Pronuntiatio._
IV. The three kinds of cases (ch. 4).
1. _Deliberativum._[192]
2. _Demonstrativum._[193]
3. _Judiciale._[194]
V. The two-fold status of cases[195] (ch. 5).
1. _Rationalis._
a. _Conjectura._[196]
b. _Finis._[197]
(1) _Juridicialis._[198]
(a) _Absoluta._[199]
(b) _Assumptiva._[200]
(_a_) _Concessio._[201]
_Purgatio._[202]
_Deprecatio._[203]
(_b_) _Remotio criminis._[204]
(_c_) _Relatio criminis._[205]
(_d_) _Comparatio._[206]
(2) _Negotialis._[207]
c. _Qualitas._[208]
d. _Translatio._[209]
2. _Legalis._
a. _Scriptum et voluntas._[210]
b. _Leges contrariae._[211]
c. _Ambiguitas._[212]
d. _Collectio._[213]
e. _Definitio legalis._[214]
VI. The three-fold division of controversies[215] (ch. 6).
1. Simple.
2. Compound.
3. Complex.
VII. The four parts of a speech[216] (ch. 7).
1. _Exordium._
2. _Narratio._
3. _Argumentatio._
4. _Conclusio._
VIII. The five modes of cases[217] (ch. 8).
1. _Honestum._
2. _Admirabile._[218]
3. _Humile._
4. _Anceps._
5. _Obscurum._
IX. Argumentation (ch. 9).
1. _Inductio._
2. _Ratiocinatio._[219]
a. _Enthymema._
b. _Epicherema._
c. _Mendacium._[220]
X. Law[221] (ch. 10).
XI. The sententious saying (ch. 11).
XII. Confirmation and denial (ch. 12).
XIII. Personification and expression of character (chs. 13–14).
XIV. Kinds of subjects (ch. 15).
_Finitum._
_Infinitum._
XV. Style and diction (ch. 16).
XVI. The three ways of speaking (ch. 17).
_Humile._
_Medium._
_Grandiloquium._
XVII. Parts of a sentence (ch. 18).
XVIII. Faults to be avoided[222] (chs. 19–20).
XIX. Figures[223] (ch. 21).
[192] “In which there is discussion of what ought or ought not
to be done in regard to any of the practical affairs of life.”
2, 4, 1. The _genus deliberativum_ is divided into _suasio_ and
_dissuasio_, and each of these again, under the three headings,
_honestum_, _utile_, _possibile_.
[193] Epideictic; divided into _laus_ and _vituperatio_, 2, 4.
[194] Forensic rhetoric.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account