An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of SevilleBrehaut, Ernest
History
An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of Seville
Brehaut, Ernest
Isidore, of Seville, Saint, -636; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[209] “When the case depends on this, that it is not the proper
person who brings the action, or that it is not before the proper
court, at the proper time, according to the proper law, charging
the proper crime, demanding the proper punishment.” 2, 5, 4.
[210] “When the words seem to be at variance with the intention
of the writer.” 2, 5, 9.
[211] “When two or more laws are perceived to be in conflict with
one another.” 2, 5, 9.
[212] “When what is written seems to have two or more meanings.”
2, 5, 10.
[213] “When from what is written another thing also which is not
written is inferred.” 2, 5, 10.
[214] “When inquiry is made as to what is the force of a word.”
2, 5, 10.
[215] A division applying only to the _genus deliberativum_.
[216] Six are usually given. Cassiodorus has _exordium_,
_narratio_, _partitio_, _confirmatio_, _reprehensio_,
_conclusio_. Halm, _Rhetores Latini Minores_, p. 497.
[217] An analysis of cases according to the emotional effect they
are likely to have on the audience.
[218] “Ut admirentur (judices) quenquam ad defensionem eius
accedere.” Halm, 316, 34, from Sulpitius Victor.
[219] The irregular syllogism. Each sub-head is exhaustively
analyzed.
[220] Giving the lie as conclusion of an irregular syllogism.
[221] A short account of the nature of law. This sub-head is not
found in the text-books on rhetoric before Isidore’s time.
[222] In the use of letters, words, and sentences.
[223] _Figurae verborum et sententiarum._ Samples of the former
are _anadiplosis_, _paradiastole_, _antimetabole_, _exoche_;
of the latter (forty-seven in all), _coenonesis_, _parrhesia_,
_aposiopesis_, _aetiologia_, _epitrochasmus_. Cf. p. 107, note.
EXTRACTS
Chapter 1. On rhetoric and its name.
1. Rhetoric is the science of speaking well in civil questions for
the purpose of persuading to what is just and good. It is called
rhetoric in the Greek ἀπὸ τοῦ ῥητορίζειν, that is, from eloquence of
speech. For speech among the Greeks is called ῥῆσις, and the orator
ῥήτωρ.
2. Rhetoric is allied to the grammatic art. For in grammar we learn
the science of speaking correctly, and in rhetoric we discover in
what way to express what we have learned.
Chapter 2. On the discoverers of the art of rhetoric.
1. This discipline was invented by Gorgias, Aristotle and Hermagoras
among the Greeks, and translated into Latin by Tullius and
Quintilian, but with such eloquence and variety that it is easy for
the reader to admire, impossible to understand.
2. For while he holds the parchment the connected discourse as it
were cleaves to his memory, but presently when it is laid aside all
recollection vanishes. Perfect knowledge of this discipline makes the
orator.
Chapter 3. On the name of the orator and the parts of rhetoric.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account