Atatürk, Kemal, 1881-1938; Turkey -- Description and travel; Turkey -- Politics and government -- 1918-1960
“Come, wake up,” I almost shouted, “it is too terrible! Someone _must_
talk to me about Islam.” And when I realised my own selfishness in not
leaving the poor man to sleep, I could only put forth the plea: “I am so
interested in your religion.”
“I am flattered indeed,” was the immediate response. “Religion in the
East is truly a real and living force.” At his grave words I saw again
that long line of weary soldiers among the mountains at their prayers.
“I shall wound your feelings,” I went on, “if I persist in questioning
you about the grievances of your people, though God knows my curiosity
is not idle.”
“It is far better to wound my feelings and publish the truth than to
suffer the slightest risk of your misjudging us. You may help to see us
righted, for Great Britain may have indeed ‘sinned in ignorance.’”
But my allusion to Lord Robert Cecil had raised the problem of
Christianity in the East. I had to admit that he was accused of working
for “union” between the Anglican and the Greek Churches. “He _is_ a
devout, loyal and energetic Anglican, but I refuse to believe that he
would ever encourage such criminal folly.”
“He is, indeed, too honourable,” replied the cheik. “That is only
another example of bringing politics into religion, which must kill
faith.”
“But does not Islam teach us that politics and religion are one?”
“No, indeed; that is a false, Western, interpretation of the Koran. It
is our work to-day to set free religion from the canker of all
statecraft.”
I could not resist interposing at this point with my conviction that no
_established_ Church can pursue wisdom; while the insecurity of our Free
Churches to-day must always “put brakes” on their power against the
Government, and “muzzle” the _real_ freedom of thought or truth.
When we got back to Greece, the cheik gave me chapter and verse for his
conviction that “if the Turks should allow the Greek Patriarch to remain
in Constantinople, their tolerance would have degenerated to mere
weakness.
“It was a golden dream for the Greeks, nearly realised; but it is not
for us to substantiate it.
“They were to drive us back into the depths of Asia Minor, to rule over
the peoples who had been their masters for five centuries, to recapture
the great ‘Bible’ towns for the Cross; to settle on the shores of
Marmora and Constantinople, that they might drive on to Rome!
“Their vision, assuredly, did not lack grandeur.
“It even seemed for a little that realisation might be achieved by zeal
and ardour, until King Constantine’s return provoked M. Briand’s famous
‘Note’ of November, 1920, and put an end to the dream.”
Here I uttered a word of regret that we had not then followed the policy
of the French “surely a course that might have saved us from all the
jealousy and suspicion we have so perversely incurred.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account