An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
Farther, those who assert the impossibility of space existing without
matter, must not only make body infinite, but must also deny a power in
God to annihilate any part of matter. No one, I suppose, will deny that
God can put an end to all motion that is in matter, and fix all the
bodies of the universe in a perfect quiet and rest, and continue them
so long as he pleases. Whoever then will allow that God can, during
such a general rest, ANNIHILATE either this book or the body of him
that reads it, must necessarily admit the possibility of a vacuum. For,
it is evident that the space that was filled by the parts of the
annihilated body will still remain, and be a space without body. For
the circumambient bodies being in perfect rest, are a wall of adamant,
and in that state make it a perfect impossibility for any other body to
get into that space. And indeed the necessary motion of one particle of
matter into the place from whence another particle of matter is
removed, is but a consequence from the supposition of plenitude; which
will therefore need some better proof than a supposed matter of fact,
which experiment can never make out;—our own clear and distinct ideas
plainly satisfying that there is no necessary connexion between space
and solidity, since we can conceive the one without the other. And
those who dispute for or against a vacuum, do thereby confess they have
distinct IDEAS of vacuum and plenum, i. e. that they have an idea of
extension void of solidity, though they deny its EXISTENCE; or else
they dispute about nothing at all. For they who so much alter the
signification of words, as to call extension body, and consequently
make the whole essence of body to be nothing but pure extension without
solidity, must talk absurdly whenever they speak of vacuum; since it is
impossible for extension to be without extension. For vacuum, whether
we affirm or deny its existence, signifies space without body; whose
very existence no one can deny to be possible, who will not make matter
infinite, and take from God a power to annihilate any particle of it.
23. Motion proves a Vacuum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account