An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
One thing seems strange to me,—that whilst all men manifestly measured
time by the motion of the great and visible bodies of the world, time
yet should be defined to be the ‘measure of motion’: whereas it is
obvious to every one who reflects ever so little on it, that to measure
motion, space is as necessary to be considered as time; and those who
look a little farther will find also the bulk of the thing moved
necessary to be taken into the computation, by any one who will
estimate or measure motion so as to judge right of it. Nor indeed does
motion any otherwise conduce to the measuring of duration, than as it
constantly brings about the return of certain sensible ideas, in
seeming equidistant periods. For if the motion of the sun were as
unequal as of a ship driven by unsteady winds, sometimes very slow, and
at others irregularly very swift; or if, being constantly equally
swift, it yet was not circular, and produced not the same
appearances,—it would not at all help us to measure time, any more than
the seeming unequal motion of a comet does.
23. Minutes, hours, days, and years are, then, no more Minutes, Hours,
Days, and Years not necessary Measures of duration, necessary to time
or duration, than inches, feet, yards, and miles, marked out in any
matter, are to extension. For, though we in this part of the universe,
by the constant use of them, as of periods set out by the revolutions
of the sun, or as known parts of such periods, have fixed the ideas of
such lengths of duration in our minds, which we apply to all parts of
time whose lengths we would consider; yet there may be other parts of
the universe, where they no more use these measures of ours, than in
Japan they do our inches, feet, or miles; but yet something analogous
to them there must be. For without some regular periodical returns, we
could not measure ourselves, or signify to others, the length of any
duration; though at the same time the world were as full of motion as
it is now, but no part of it disposed into regular and apparently
equidistant revolutions. But the different measures that may be made
use of for the account of time, do not at all alter the notion of
duration, which is the thing to be measured; no more than the different
standards of a foot and a cubit alter the notion of extension to those
who make use of those different measures.
24. Our Measure of Time applicable to Duration before Time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account