An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
Another reason that makes me doubt of any innate practical principles
is, that I think _there cannot any one moral Rule be propos’d whereof a
Man may not justly demand a Reason:_ which would be perfectly
ridiculous and absurd if they were innate; or so much as self-evident,
which every innate principle must needs be, and not need any proof to
ascertain its truth, nor want any reason to gain it approbation. He
would be thought void of common sense who asked on the one side, or on
the other side went to give a reason WHY “it is impossible for the same
thing to be and not to be.” It carries its own light and evidence with
it, and needs no other proof: he that understands the terms assents to
it for its own sake or else nothing will ever be able to prevail with
him to do it. But should that most unshaken rule of morality and
foundation of all social virtue, “That one should do as he would be
done unto,” be proposed to one who never heard of it before, but yet is
of capacity to understand its meaning; might he not without any
absurdity ask a reason why? And were not he that proposed it bound to
make out the truth and reasonableness of it to him? Which plainly shows
it not to be innate; for if it were it could neither want nor receive
any proof; but must needs (at least as soon as heard and understood) be
received and assented to as an unquestionable truth, which a man can by
no means doubt of. So that the truth of all these moral rules plainly
depends upon some other antecedent to them, and from which they must be
deduced; which could not be if either they were innate or so much as
self-evident.
5. Instance in keeping Compacts
That men should keep their compacts is certainly a great and undeniable
rule in morality. But yet, if a Christian, who has the view of
happiness and misery in another life, be asked why a man must keep his
word, he will give this as a reason:—Because God, who has the power of
eternal life and death, requires it of us. But if a Hobbist be asked
why? he will answer:—Because the public requires it, and the Leviathan
will punish you if you do not. And if one of the old philosophers had
been asked, he would have answered:—Because it was dishonest, below the
dignity of a man, and opposite to virtue, the highest perfection of
human nature, to do otherwise.
6. Virtue generally approved not because innate, but because
profitable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account