An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of AssentNewman, John Henry
Religion
An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent
Newman, John Henry
Faith; Theism
minds a profession which they cannot understand.
But it is not the necessary result of unity of profession, nor is it
the fact, that the Church imposes dogmatic statements on the interior
assent of those who cannot apprehend them. The difficulty is removed
by the dogma of the Church’s infallibility, and of the consequent duty
of “implicit faith” in her word. The “One Holy Catholic and Apostolic
Church” is an article of the Creed, and an article, which, inclusive
of her infallibility, all men, high and low, can easily master and
accept with a real and operative assent. It stands in the place of all
abstruse propositions in a Catholic’s mind, for to believe in her word
is virtually to believe in them all. Even what he cannot understand, at
least he can believe to be true; and he believes it to be true because
he believes in the Church.
The _rationale_ of this provision for unlearned devotion is as
follows:—It stands to reason that all of us, learned and unlearned, are
bound to believe the whole revealed doctrine in all its parts and in
all that it implies, according as portion after portion is brought home
to our consciousness as belonging to it; and it also stands to reason,
that a doctrine, so deep and so various, as the revealed _depositum_
of faith, cannot be brought home to us and made our own all at once.
No mind, however large, however penetrating, can directly and fully
by one act understand any one truth, however simple. What can be more
intelligible than that “Alexander conquered Asia,” or that “Veracity
is a duty”? but what a multitude of propositions is included under
either of these theses! still, if we profess either, we profess all
that it includes. Thus, as regards the Catholic Creed, if we really
believe that our Lord is God, we believe all that is meant by such a
belief; or, else, we are not in earnest, when we profess to believe the
proposition. In the act of believing it at all, we forthwith commit
ourselves by anticipation to believe truths which at present we do not
believe, because they have never come before us;—we limit henceforth
the range of our private judgment in prospect by the conditions,
whatever they are, of that dogma. Thus the Arians said that they
believed in our Lord’s divinity, but when they were pressed to confess
His eternity, they denied it: thereby showing in fact that they never
had believed in His divinity at all. In other words, a man who really
believes in our Lord’s proper divinity, believes _implicitè_ in His
eternity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account