An Essay on the Development of Christian DoctrineNewman, John Henry
Religion
An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine
Newman, John Henry
Catholic Church -- Doctrines; Dogma, Development of
"The Catholics," says the _Quarterly Review_ for January, 1873, pp.
181-2, "wherever they are numerous and powerful in a Protestant nation,
_compel_ (sic) as it were by a law of their being, that nation to treat
them with stern repression and control. . . . Catholicism, if it be true
to itself, and its mission, _cannot_ (sic) . . . wherever and whenever
the opportunity is afforded it, abstain from claiming, working for, and
grasping that supremacy and paramount influence and control, which it
conscientiously believes to be its inalienable and universal due. . . .
By the force of circumstances, by the inexorable logic of its claims, it
must be the intestine foe or the disturbing element of every state in
which it does not bear sway; and . . . it must now stand out in the
estimate of all Protestants, Patriots and Thinkers" (philosophers and
historians, as Tacitus?) "as the _hostis humani generis_ (sic), &c."]
[254:1] De Præscr. Hær. 41, Oxf. tr.
[254:2] χρονῖται.
[256:1] Cat. xviii. 26.
[257:1] Contr. Ep. Manich. 5.
[257:2] Origen, Opp. t. i. p. 809.
[258:1] Strom. vii. 17.
[258:2] c. Tryph. 35.
[258:3] Instit. 4. 30.
[259:1] Hær. 42, p. 366.
[259:2] In Lucif. fin.
[259:3] The Oxford translation is used.
[263:1] _Rationabilis_; apparently an allusion to the civil officer
called _Catholicus_ or _Rationalis_, receiver-general.
[263:2] Ad. Parm. ii. init.
[264:1] De Unit. Eccles. 6.
[265:1] Contr. Cresc. iv. 75; also iii. 77.
[266:1] Antiq. ii. 4, § 5.
[267:1] Antiq. 5, § 3. [Bingham apparently in this passage is indirectly
replying to the Catholic argument for the Pope's Supremacy drawn from
the titles and acts ascribed to him in antiquity; but that argument is
cumulative in character, being part of a whole body of proof; and there
is moreover a great difference between a rhetorical discourse and a
synodal enunciation as at Chalcedon.]
[268:1] Ad Demetr. 4, &c. Oxf. Tr.
[268:2] Hist. ch. xv.
[269:1] De Unit. 5, 12.
[269:2] Chrys. in Eph. iv.
[269:3] De Baptism. i. 10.
[269:4] c. Ep. Parm. i. 7.
[269:5] De Schism. Donat. i. 10.
[270:1] Cat. xvi. 10.
[270:2] De Fid. ad Petr. 39. [82.]
[270:3] [Of course this solemn truth must not be taken apart from the
words of the present Pope, Pius IX., concerning invincible ignorance:
"Notum nobis vobisque est, eos, qui invincibili circa sanctissimam
nostram religionem ignorantiâ laborant, quique naturalem legem ejusque
præcepta in omnium cordibus a Deo insculpta sedulo servantes, ac Deo
obedire parati, honestam rectamque vitam agunt, posse, divinæ lucis et
gratiæ operante virtute, æternam consequi vitam, cùm Deus, qui omnium
mentes, animos, cogitationes, habitusque planè intuetur, scrutatur et
noscit, pro summâ suâ bonitate et clementia, minimè patiatur quempiam
æternis puniri suppliciis, qui voluntariæ culpæ reatum non habeat."]
[272:1] Epp. 43, 52, 57, 76, 105, 112, 141, 144.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account