An essay towards a natural history of serpentsOwen, Charles
History
An essay towards a natural history of serpents
Owen, Charles
Serpent worship -- Early works to 1800; Serpents -- Early works to 1800; Serpents -- Religious aspects -- Early works to 1800
And perhaps when Angels, the Messengers of Heaven, conversed with _Adam_
and _Eve_, it might be in the Shape of flying speaking Serpents. Without
allowing this mutual Intercourse, and former Familiarity, we can’t well
suppose that our first Parents, tho’ not furnish’d with so much
Knowledge as is usually ascribed to them, would be conquer’d by a
_Demon_ in the Shape of a _Serpent_, which naturally is a Beast of the
Field, and known to be so by _Adam_, who, but a little before, had
enrolled it among his Subjects, and given it a significant Name.
Can we imagine our first Parents so stupid, as to hold a Conversation
with a Beast, without Surprize, Jealousy, and Suspicion? _Adam_, who
knew the Properties of inferior Animals, (to whom he had given proper
Names a little before) could not but know, that the _Serpent_ was a
_Beast_, and had no Organs fitted for the Formation of articulate
Sounds, much less a Power to fix proper Ideas to them, and support an
Argument by arguing the Case in a rational manner. Could _Adam_, who was
the Image of God upon Earth, hear a Brute speak and dispute in the
Language of Paradise, without a Suspicion of Imposture or something
ominous?
During the Woman’s Parley with the Serpent, _Adam_ is supposed to be
absent, perhaps thro’ Satan’s Management, and upon her representing to
him at their next meeting, the Conversation she had with the Serpent, he
must conclude that Serpent to be a _grand Cheat_, or a _good Angel_,
that spoke to his Wife: and that he took it in the latter Sense, is
plain from the Event; that is, his taking the forbidden Fruit, and
eating thereof upon the Serpent’s Recommendation of it to his Wife, who
found no ill Effect from her Compliance. Now, the Tempter having assur’d
the Woman that her eating that Fruit would not bring Death, and _Adam_
finding it to be true in Fact, that is, that she did eat and live after
it, concluded he might eat with equal Safety.
Upon this Supposition, we may charitably infer, that since our first
Mother might converse with Angels in that serpentine, or some other
bright Form, she now converses with the Serpent without Scruple or Dread
of Imposture. And as she apprehended the Serpent to be a good and kind
Spirit, so _Adam_ did, upon her Representation of the Matter, and took
the forbidden Fruit, and eat it: And perhaps the Serpent was present,
giving Attestation to the Report made by the Woman to her Husband.
This being granted, ’tis conceivable how the Woman might freely converse
with a Creature that assum’d an Image so glorious, especially if we
consider she was in her infantile State, and without any experimental
Knowledge, or any Apprehension of Danger, from an Enemy, of which she
had no Idea; being no Sinner, she was without Fear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account