An essay towards a natural history of serpentsOwen, Charles
History
An essay towards a natural history of serpents
Owen, Charles
Serpent worship -- Early works to 1800; Serpents -- Early works to 1800; Serpents -- Religious aspects -- Early works to 1800
In his Plot against _Adam_, the Deceiver was deceived; for he made no
doubt but the Sentence of Death would be immediately executed upon
_Adam_ and _Eve_, and upon the Extinction of the human Species, God
would lose all his Honour upon Earth. Why did not he appear to our first
Parents in a human Form? probably because he might apprehend, that there
was no other Man or Woman, but themselves.
Having considered _Adam_ in his probationary Capacity, I shall in the
next place observe these three Things, by way of Illustration.
I. _It was most congruous that Man’s first State should be a State of
Trial._ II. _That his Trial should be by the Laws of his Creator._
III. _That those Laws should be inforced by a proper Sanction._
I. _IT was congruous and fit, our first Parents should begin their Life
in a way of Trial, as they were moral Agents_: In which Situation I
apprehend all the Angels to be at first, to see how they would behave
towards the Great Author of their Being and Blessedness, before they
were establish’d. No Creature, as such, is capable of Immutability, any
more than of Omnipotence. To be naturally, and necessarily immutable, is
the sole Prerogative of the Almighty: The perpetual Duration of created
Beings, is not from their Nature, but from the Divine Will.
Our first Parents were under a strong Guard, and not to be disarm’d
without their own Consent; tho’ the Devil, as he was a Spirit, excelled
in Power, yet he could not by Force subdue the weaker Vessel, therefore
conducted the bloody Design by Stratagems. When the Woman was sollicited
by the Tempter, one strong _Negative_ would have put him to _flight_. A
resolute Denial, without any other Means, would have made her
victorious, tho’ assaulted by all the Legions of Hell; therefore, no
room to complain of Deficiency in Divine Goodness.
’Tis beyond all doubt, that the Revelation given to _Adam_ (as that to
Christian Churches in After-ages) made it a fundamental part of his
Duty, not to attend to any Insinuations contrary to those delivered to
him by his Creator, tho’ recommended even by an Angel from Heaven:
Temptations to forbidden Fruit, however pleasant, should not be parley’d
with, but peremptorily rejected.
II. _IT was equally proper, that a Creature should be govern’d by the
Laws of his Creator_; as it implies a Contradiction for a Creature to be
independent, which it must suppose itself to be, when govern’d by its
own Laws. The Will of the Creator was surely the fittest, for the
Obedience of Creatures; one part of which was, that they must not have
an Indulgence of all the Trees in _Eden_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account