An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus — John Shaqi
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of JesusGreenleaf, Simon
Religion
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus
Greenleaf, Simon
Apologetics; Authority -- Religious aspects; Bible. Gospels -- Evidences, authority, etc.; Jesus Christ -- Trial
§ 12. MATTHEW, called also LEVI, was a Jew of Galilee, but of what city is
uncertain. He held the place of publican, or tax-gatherer, under the Roman
government, and his office seems to have consisted in collecting the taxes
within his district, as well as the duties and customs levied on goods and
persons, passing in and out of his district or province, across the lake
of Genesareth. While engaged in this business, at the office or usual
place of collection, he was required by Jesus to follow him, as one of his
disciples; a command which he immediately obeyed. Soon afterwards, he
appears to have given a great entertainment to his fellow-publicans and
friends, at which Jesus was present; intending probably both to celebrate
his own change of profession, and to give them an opportunity to profit by
the teaching of his new Master.(15) He was constituted one of the twelve
apostles, and constantly attended the person of Jesus as a faithful
follower, until the crucifixion; and after the ascension of his Master he
preached the gospel for some time, with the other apostles, in Judea, and
afterwards in Ethiopia, where he died.
He is generally allowed to have written first, of all the evangelists; but
whether in the Hebrew or the Greek language, or in both, the learned are
not agreed, nor is it material to our purpose to inquire; the genuineness
of our present Greek gospel being sustained by satisfactory evidence.(16)
The precise time when he wrote is also uncertain, the several dates given
to it among learned men, varying from A.D. 37 to A.D. 64. The earlier
date, however, is argued with greater force, from the improbability that
the Christians would be left for several years without a general and
authentic history of our Saviour’s ministry; from the evident allusions
which it contains to a state of persecution in the church at the time it
was written; from the titles of sanctity ascribed to Jerusalem, and a
higher veneration testified for the temple than is found in the other and
later evangelists; from the comparative gentleness with which Herod’s
character and conduct are dealt with, that bad prince probably being still
in power; and from the frequent mention of Pilate, as still governor of
Judea.(17)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account