An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of JesusGreenleaf, Simon
Religion
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus
Greenleaf, Simon
Apologetics; Authority -- Religious aspects; Bible. Gospels -- Evidences, authority, etc.; Jesus Christ -- Trial
ingenuity and want of faith were proverbial. It was to such an employment
and under such circumstances, that Matthew was educated; an employment
which must have made him acquainted with the Greek language, and
extensively conversant with the public affairs and the men of business of
his time; thus entitling him to our confidence, as an experienced and
intelligent observer of events passing before him. And if the men of that
day were, as in truth they appear to have been, as much disposed as those
of the present time, to evade the payment of public taxes and duties, and
to elude, by all possible means, the vigilance of the revenue officers,
Matthew must have been familiar with a great variety of the forms of
fraud, imposture, cunning, and deception, and must have become habitually
distrustful, scrutinizing, and cautious; and, of course, much less likely
to have been deceived in regard to many of the facts in our Lord’s
ministry, extraordinary as they were, which fell under his observation.
This circumstance shows both the sincerity and the wisdom of Jesus, in
selecting him for an eye-witness of his conduct, and adds great weight to
the value of the testimony of this evangelist.
§ 15. MARK was the son of a pious sister of Barnabas, named Mary, who
dwelt at Jerusalem, and at whose home the early Christians often
assembled. His Hebrew name was John; the surname of Mark having been
adopted, as is supposed, when he left Judea to preach the gospel in
foreign countries; a practice not unusual among the Jews of that age, who
frequently, upon such occasions, assumed a name more familiar than their
own to the people whom they visited. He is supposed to have been converted
to the Christian faith by the ministry of Peter. He travelled from
Jerusalem to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas, and afterwards accompanied
them elsewhere. When they landed at Perga in Pamphylia, he left them and
returned to Jerusalem; for which reason, when he afterwards would have
gone with them, Paul refused to take him. Upon this, a difference of
opinion arose between the two apostles, and they separated, Barnabas
taking Mark with him to Cyprus. Subsequently he accompanied Timothy to
Rome, at the express desire of Paul. From this city he probably went into
Asia, where he found Peter, with whom he returned to Rome, in which city
he is supposed to have written and published his Gospel. Such is the
outline of his history, as it is furnished by the New Testament.(20) The
early historians add, that after this he went into Egypt and planted a
church in Alexandria, where he died.(21)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account