An Example of Communal Currency: The facts about the Guernsey Market HouseHarris, Joseph Theodore
History
An Example of Communal Currency: The facts about the Guernsey Market House
Harris, Joseph Theodore
Finance -- Guernsey; Paper money -- Guernsey
The need for enlarging and covering the Market was meanwhile being more
and more pressed, the site and certain buildings having been purchased
on 10th April, 1817, for £5,000, which was borrowed at 4-½ per
cent.[1] A Committee reported on this subject to the meeting of the
States on 6th October, 1819. In their recommendation they proposed "the
issue of Notes of £1 sterling, payable at different times on the receipt
of the part of the Duty left at the disposal of the States."
Notwithstanding the pathetic appeal already recorded, the proposal of
the Committee to enlarge and to cover the Market was lost by a majority
of one.
The advocates for improving the Market, however, persevered, and
presented to the States Meeting of 12th May, 1820, five plans. The plan
of John Savery Brock at a cost of £5,500 was agreed to by a majority of
19 to 10.
The following quotation from the Committee's report shows the benefits
which they considered would arise from their scheme for raising the
£5,500 required.
"The means of meeting this would be to apply to
it the sums now in litigation with the town £1,000
Twenty-shilling Notes put at the disposal of
the Committee 4,500
-------
£5,500
But provision must be made for the repayment of the Notes issued, and
the means recommended by your Committee are as follows--
"The 36 shops, built for butchers according to
the plan recommended, would produce at £5
sterling per annum £180
From this must be deducted £20 for hiring the
house at the corner and £10 for repairs 30
------
£150
The States should grant for 10 years after the
first year 300
------
This would give an income of £450
This sum would be spent each year in paying off and cancelling as many
Notes.
"Thus, at the end of ten years, all the Notes would be cancelled and the
States would be in possession of an income of £150 per annum, which
would be a return for the £3,000 spent by them.
"Looked at from all sides the scheme shows nothing but the greatest
advantage for the public and for the States. It should please those who
have at heart the diminution of the debt, since the States in addition
to the £1,000 set aside for this purpose, take a further £300 out of
their treasury in order to increase their income (_en prenant 300l. de
plus sur leurs épargnes pour accroître leur revenu_)."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account