An Historical Account of the Settlements of Scotch Highlanders in AmericaMacLean, J. P. (John Patterson)
History
An Historical Account of the Settlements of Scotch Highlanders in America
MacLean, J. P. (John Patterson)
Scots -- America; Scots -- United States
It is one of the most singular things in history that the people of
Scotland should have been so hostile to the Americans, and so forward in
expressing their approbation of the attitude of George III. and his
ministers. The Americans had in no wise ever harmed them or crossed
their path. The emigrants from Scotland had been received with open arms
by the people. If any had been mistreated, it was by the appointees of
the crown. With scarcely an exception the whole political
representation in both Houses of Parliament supported lord North, and
were bitterly opposed to the Americans. Lecky has tried to soften the
matter by throwing the blame on the servile leaders who did not
represent the real sentiment of the people:
"Scotland, however, is one of the very few instances in history, of a
nation whose political representation was so grossly defective as not
merely to distort but absolutely to conceal its opinions. It was
habitually looked upon as the most servile and corrupt portion of the
British Empire; and the eminent liberalism and the very superior
political qualities of its people seem to have been scarcely
suspected to the very eve of the Reform Bill of 1832. That something
of that liberalism existed at the outbreak of the American war, may,
I think, be inferred from the very significant fact that the
Government were unable to obtain addresses in their favor either from
Edinburgh or Glasgow. The country, however, was judged mainly by its
representatives, and it was regarded as far more hostile to the
American cause than either England or Ireland."[146]
A very able editor writing at the time has observed:
"It must however be acknowledge, that an unusual apathy with respect
to public affairs, seemed to prevail with the people, in general, of
this country; of which a stronger proof needs not to be given, that
than which will probably recur to every body's memory, that the
accounts of many of the late military actions, as well as of
political procedings of no less importance, were received with as
much indifference, and canvassed with as much coolness and unconcern,
as if they had happened between two nations with whom they were
scarcely connected. We must except from all these observations, the
people of North Britain (Scotland), who, almost to a man, so far as
they could be described or distinguished under any particular
denomination, not only applauded, but proffered life and fortune in
support of the present measures."[147]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account