An historical and moral view of the origin and progress of the French Revolution; and the effect it has produced in EuropeWollstonecraft, Mary
Philosophy
An historical and moral view of the origin and progress of the French Revolution; and the effect it has produced in Europe
Wollstonecraft, Mary
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Causes
As a nation, the french are certainly the most eloquent people in the
world; their lively feelings giving the warmth of passion to every
argument they attempt to support. And speaking fluently, vanity leads
them continually to endeavour to utter their sentiments, without
considering whether they have any thing to recommend them to notice,
beside a happy choice of expressions. Only thinking then of speaking,
they are the most impatient of hearers, coughing, hemming, and scraping
with their feet, most audibly, to beguile the time. Laying aside also,
in the assembly, not only their national politeness, but the common
restraints of civility; good manners seldom supply the place of reason,
when they are angry. And as the slightest contradiction sets them on
fire, three parts out of four of the time, which ought to have been
employed in serious investigation, was consumed in idle vehemence.
Whilst the applauses and hisses of the galleries increased the tumult;
making the vain still more eager to mount the stage. Thus every thing
contributing to excite the emotions, which lead men only to court
admiration, the good of the people was too often sacrificed to the
desire of pleasing them. And so completely was the tide of their
affection for the king turned, that they seemed averse to his having any
portion of legislative authority in the new constitution.
The duke de Liancourt divided the question respecting the share of power
he was to enjoy as a part of the government. _1st. Is the royal sanction
indispensably necessary, to give the actual force of law to the decrees
of the national assembly? 2dly. Ought the king to be an integrant
portion of the legislature?_ In England the phrase _royal assent_ has
been adopted, as expressive of a positive act; but the french, rather
choosing to distinguish the same act of power by a negative, fixed on
the latin word _veto_, _I forbid_. And then it became a question, how
far this _veto_ ought to extend, supposing the prince to be invested
with it.—Was it decisively to obstruct the enaction of a law passed by
the legislative body? or only to suspend it, till an appeal could be
made to the people by a new election?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account