An illustrated commentary on the Gospel according to St. JohnAbbott, Lyman
Religion
An illustrated commentary on the Gospel according to St. John
Abbott, Lyman
Bible. John -- Commentaries
=5. A city of Samaria called Sychar.= The prevalent opinion is that
Sychar is a corruption of the name Shechem, that it means _drunken_,
and that this slight change was given by the Jews to the rival capital
in derision, and in possible allusion to Isaiah 28:1. If this be so,
it must have become current at this time; for we can hardly believe
that John would otherwise embody a mere term of derision in the
Evangelical narrative. Dr. Thomson (_Land and Book_, ii:206, following
Hug, Luthardt, and Ewald) identifies the ancient Sychar with a village
about half a mile north of the supposed site of Jacob’s well, called
Aschar; and as the corruption of Shechem into Sychar is a mere
hypothesis, framed to account for the use of the word here, Dr.
Thomson’s opinion appears to me the more probable. Shechem was two
miles distant from Jacob’s well, and apparently was abundantly
supplied with water.
[Illustration: JACOB’S WELL.]
6 Now Jacob’s well was there. Jesus therefore, being
wearied with _his_ journey, sat thus on the well: _and_ it
was about the sixth hour.
=6. Now Jacob’s spring was there.= There are two Greek words
translated _well_ in this narrative: the first means a spring or
fountain, _i. e._, water-source; the second a well or cistern, _i.
e._, a water-chamber. The first (πηγή) is used here, indicating that
the well was fed internally by springs, not externally by rain. A
well, now dry and deserted, answering to all the conditions of the
narrative here, is designated by an ancient tradition as the one here
described; and the case is one of the very few in Palestine in which
tradition appears to be trustworthy. It is accepted even by Dr.
Robinson. The purchase of the ground by Jacob is described in Gen.
33:18-20, but for the digging of the well there is no other authority
than tradition, unless Gen. 49:22 is an allusion to it. Whether Jacob
himself dug it, or whether his name was subsequently given to it by
tradition is not known, nor does the reference here determine that
question; it only designates the well by its customary name. Why he
should have dug a well at all has been made matter of question, since
the whole valley abounds with water. To this question Dr. Thomson
replies: “The well is a very _positive_ fact, and it must have been
dug by somebody, notwithstanding this abundance of fountains, and why
not by Jacob?” And he suggests that these fountains may have been
already appropriated by the native population. The site of the well is
in the valley between Mts. Gerizim and Ebal. For a striking
description of this valley, see Van der Velde. The historical
associations connected with the site were many and sacred. There the
Lord first appeared to Abraham (Gen. 12:6, 7); Jacob built his first
altar (Gen. 33:18-20); Joseph sought his brethren in vain (Gen.
37:12); Joshua rehearsed the law, with its blessings and cursings, and
amidst the loud amens of the assembled people (Josh. 8:30-35;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account