An illustrated commentary on the Gospel according to St. JohnAbbott, Lyman
Religion
An illustrated commentary on the Gospel according to St. John
Abbott, Lyman
Bible. John -- Commentaries
II. _Opinions._ These are three: (1) That the narrative belongs here;
was written by John, and was expunged from the Gospel at an early date
because it was feared that an immoral use would be made of it. This
was Augustine’s opinion. But this hypothesis does not account for the
variety of readings, nor for peculiarities in character and diction
which make it unlike John’s Gospel. (2) That it is an interpolation of
a later age, for a purpose, by some early copyist. But the copyist who
could have conceived this incident must have possessed the moral
genius of Christ himself. “It is eminently Christlike, and full of
comfort to penitent outcasts. It breathes the Saviour’s spirit of holy
mercy, which condemns the sin and saves the sinner. It is parallel to
the parable of the prodigal, the story of Mary Magdalene, and that of
the Samaritan woman, and agrees with many express declarations of
Christ that he came not to condemn, but to save the lost (John 3:17;
12:47; Luke 9:56; 19:10; comp. John 5:14; Luke 7:37, etc.). His
refusal to act as judge in this case has a parallel in a similar case
related in Luke 12:13-15.”--(_Schaff._) (3) That it is a tradition of
the apostolic age, and was incorporated in the present evangelical
narratives, probably in the second or third century, but in different
forms and in different places. It may have been originally part of one
of the lost Gospels. Eusebius relates that the work of Papias
contained “the history of a woman accused before the Lord of numerous
sins, a history contained also in the Gospel of the Hebrews.” This
opinion, which is substantially that of Godet, Meyer, Luthardt, and
Alford, accounts for the existence of the narrative, the apparent
truthfulness of it, the variations of form, and the non-Johannean
characteristics of style. It seems to me inherently the most probable.
On internal grounds it seems to me clear that the narrative is
historical; on critical grounds that it is not John’s; who was its
author and how it became incorporated in John’s Gospel is a matter
only of conjecture.
1 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
2 And early in the morning he came again into the temple,
and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and
taught them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account