An illustrated commentary on the Gospel according to St. JohnAbbott, Lyman
Religion
An illustrated commentary on the Gospel according to St. John
Abbott, Lyman
Bible. John -- Commentaries
[416] ch. 17:2.
30 I[417] and _my_ Father are one.
[417] ch. 17:11, 22.
=28-30. And I give unto them eternal life.= Life is the _gift_ of God
through Jesus Christ (ch. 1:12; 4:10, 14; 6:27, 32, 51; Rom. 5:17;
6:23; Eph. 1:17), but the necessary condition of receiving it is
faith in his Son, _i. e._, the ability to appreciate spiritual life
in its highest and most perfect manifestation, and a readiness to
follow after it, by leaving all things else to attain it, as did Paul
(Phil. 3:13, 14).--=And they shall never perish, neither shall
any pluck them out of my hand.= The word rendered _perish_ is literally
_destroy themselves_ (ἀπόλωνται, _middle voice_); and this seems to
me to be the meaning here; otherwise there would be a repetition,
the second clause of the promise only reiterating the first clause.
The word _man_ is not in the original; _any_ includes all powers,
human and superhuman. I, then, understand Christ’s declaration to be
that the souls which trust in him _shall never destroy themselves,
and no one shall pluck them out of his hand_; _i. e._, he promises
to protect his disciples both against their own weaknesses and also
against the strength of assailants; from fears without and foes
within; from treachery in the soul, and from assaults on the soul.
See 1 Cor. 10:13; 15:10; Phil. 4:19; Col. 1:11, etc.--=My Father which
gave them to me, is greater than all.= There is some uncertainty as to
the reading, but the best critics agree in sustaining the received
text.--=No one is able to pluck them out of my Father’s hand. I and my
Father are one.= Without entering into any doubtful disputations
respecting the relation of the Father and the Son, a problem which I
believe transcends human knowledge, it is evident that the connection
here requires us to understand Christ as declaring himself one with
the Father, not merely in will or desire, as the disciple is to be one
with his Lord, but also in spiritual power. The argument is, “My sheep
shall never perish, since my Father who gave them into my hand is
greater than all, and I who hold them, am one with him.” This argument
would be without force if the meaning was not that Christ’s _power_ is
equal to that of the Father. His will might be perfectly in harmony
with the divine will, he still could not be trusted as a divine
Saviour unless his power was commensurate with his will. So all the
best expositors, _Alford_, _Godet_, _Meyer_, _Luthardt_, _Tholuck_.
31 Then[418] the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
[418] ch. 8:59.
32 Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed
you from my Father; for which of those works do ye
stone me?
33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone
thee not; but for blasphemy; and because[419] that thou,
being a man, makest thyself God.
[419] verse 30; ch. 5:18; Ps. 82:6; Rom. 13:1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account