An inquiry into the propagation of contagious poisons, by the atmosphere : $b as also into the nature and effects of vitiated air, its forms and sources, and other causes of pestilence : with directions for avoiding the action of contagion, and observations on some means for promoting public healthAlison, Somerville Scott
Science
An inquiry into the propagation of contagious poisons, by the atmosphere : $b as also into the nature and effects of vitiated air, its forms and sources, and other causes of pestilence : with directions for avoiding the action of contagion, and observations on some means for promoting public health
Alison, Somerville Scott
Communicable diseases; Public health
Dr Patrick Russell was satisfied, from the observation of much of that
pestilence, that the atmospheric contagion did not extend the distance
of four feet; and there is much room to think that, if he had extended
his inquiry farther, that had he been aware how unusual it is for a
proximate animal principle, as contagious matter, to take on the
aeriform state, he would have arrived at the conclusion, that it did not
only not exist, at the distance of four feet from the patient, but that
it did not exist at all. Had he gone that length, he would not have
created any more difficulties, to be explained away, than were made by
laying down for it, such a limited range of operation, for there would,
it seems, be little difficulty, in general, in discovering, that persons
who had approached so near as four feet to the patient, had come in
contact either with the sick himself, or the matter of the sores
attached to clothes or other bodies.
We know of no facts capable of proving that the matter of plague is
diffusible through the air; and the very evidence of Dr Russell, which
was used by him to prove the limited range of atmospheric contagion, may
be used to lend countenance to the position, that it does not exist at
all.
The evidence was this:—Dr Russell was in the practice, at Aleppo, of
examining plague sores from a window four feet from the patient, yet he
suffered not from that pestilence.
Scarlet Fever is a disease universally held to be one of those
propagated by a contagious principle.
It is commonly believed that a contagious poison is eliminated in the
course of this disease, similar to that of small-pox.
Its history is marked by this remarkable feature, peculiar to acute
contagious diseases, of attacking the same individual only once; and the
disease is accompanied by a peculiar eruption, which may, without
impropriety, be supposed to contain the said contagious poison. This
eruption is uniform in the time of its appearance, its duration, and
decay, like the other eruptions of other contagious diseases. On all
these accounts, the Author is disposed to assent to its possession of
the contagious poison;—and that will be taken for granted.
Connected with this view, is an observation made by Dr Sidey, of
Edinburgh, in a paper contained in a late Number of the Edinburgh
Medical and Surgical Journal, on Scarlatina, as lately prevalent in that
town. It is to this effect, that he found that the disease, when
characterized by a distinct eruption, attacked several members of a
family more frequently, than when it wanted that symptom.
We will inquire whether persons exposed to an atmosphere containing one
sick of that disease, take that distemper as uniformly, as those take
the respective diseases of those palpable contagious poisons which may
be inserted under the skin.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account