An inquiry into the propagation of contagious poisons, by the atmosphere : $b as also into the nature and effects of vitiated air, its forms and sources, and other causes of pestilence : with directions for avoiding the action of contagion, and observations on some means for promoting public healthAlison, Somerville Scott
Science
An inquiry into the propagation of contagious poisons, by the atmosphere : $b as also into the nature and effects of vitiated air, its forms and sources, and other causes of pestilence : with directions for avoiding the action of contagion, and observations on some means for promoting public health
Alison, Somerville Scott
Communicable diseases; Public health
Thus, then, it is proved, that some causes, totally independent of
atmospheric contagion, produce the first cases of an epidemic, or widely
spread disease. Now, there is no evidence that these same causes are not
operating upon those who visit the sick, and in absence of any facts to
the contrary, and of the operation of an equally active and undoubted
agent, there is justice in thinking it probable that they are acting,
more especially if the self-same results are manifested—and this may,
with safety, be done, even when direct testimony cannot be
obtained—which is very seldom entirely the case.
The causes of the disease being widely extended, and the visited patient
being ill from the operation of forces shared in common with many, it is
only fair to conclude that as relatives, attendants, and visitors are
like the great mass of people thus operated upon—that they, _cæteris
paribus_, are as likely to be affected with the prevalent disease, as
those who are suffering were previous to its invasion.
They do suffer, but not in general in a greater proportion than other
persons having no communication, and similarly situated in other
respects.
It would be ample time to look for the operation of some other agency in
addition to those commonly experienced, when the portion of the
community, holding communication with the sick, is affected with disease
in a greater proportion than that portion having none.
Now, with a few exceptions, it is the result of much patient
investigation, not only into the experience of others, but of many
epidemics we have had the most ample means of noting, that, in general,
in respect to diseases held to be propagated by atmospheric contagion,
those who have communication with the sick, do not suffer in a greater
proportion than those who keep apart, but remain in the sphere in which
the agencies and circumstances are operating, which produced the first
cases.
These exceptions are—
_1st_, The relations and inmates of the same house inhabited by one
sick of fever.
_2d_, Those receiving disease from actual contact with the palpable
contagious matter, or by contactual contagion.
_3d_, Those persons, through the operation of fear, and from
depression of mind, affected with disease, as fever,
cholera, &c.
_4th_, The attendants in fever institutions, &c.
These exceptions will meet with a little consideration, in order to shew
in what manner, and wherefore, those persons are seized in greater
proportion, and to prove that it is not in consequence of atmospheric
contagion.
This statement is important, and is made cautiously, and only after the
most detailed examination, and unprejudiced weighing of evidence.
The facts which have led to that conclusion might be detailed, but, as
they would occupy much room, and perhaps prove uninteresting to the
general reader, they will be withheld, however, to be produced, if any
sufficient objections be made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account