Cobitis. Amia. Silurus. Teuthis. Loricaria. Salmo. Fistularia. Esox. Elops. Argentina. Atherina. Mugil. Mormyrus. Exocœtus. Polynemus. Clupea. Cyprinus. [Sidenote: Gronow and Klein.] Two contemporaries of _Linnæus_ attempted a systematic arrangement of fishes; both had considerable opportunities for their study, especially in possessing extensive collections; but neither exercised any influence on the progress of Ichthyology. The one, L. T. GRONOW, a German who resided in Holland, closely followed the arrangements proposed by Artedi and Linnæus, and increased the number of genera and species from the contents of his own museum. He published two works, “Museum Ichthyologicum” (Lugd. 1754–6, fol.), and “Zoophylacium” (Lugd. 1763–81, fol.); a posthumous work, containing numerous excellent descriptions of new forms was published by J. E. Gray in 1854 under the title of “Systema Ichthyologicum.” To Gronow also is due the invention of preparing flat skins of fishes in a dry state, and preserving them in the manner of a herbarium. The specimens thus prepared by him belong to the oldest which have been preserved down to our time. Much less important are the ichthyological labours of J. T. KLEIN (1685–1759). They are embodied in five parts (_Missus_) of a work entitled “Historia naturalis piscium” (Sedæ, 1740–9, 4to.) He regarded a system merely as the means of recognising the various forms of animals, not as the expression of their natural affinities; and that method seemed to him to be the most perfect by which an animal could be most readily determined. He eschewed all reference to minute or anatomical characters. Hence his system is a series of the most unnatural combinations, and we cannot be surprised that Linnæus passed in silence over Klein’s labours. * * * * * [Sidenote: Pupils and Successors of Linnæus]