An introduction to the study of mammals living and extinctLydekker, Richard
Science
An introduction to the study of mammals living and extinct
Lydekker, Richard
Mammals
round the top of the dentinal papilla, and has assumed a somewhat complex
structure, results in the formation of the enamel-coating of the crown of
the tooth. While these changes are taking place the tissues immediately
surrounding the tooth-germ become condensed and differentiated into a
capsule, which appears to grow up from the base of the dental papilla,
and encloses both this and the enamel-germ, constituting the follicle
or tooth-sac. By the ossification of the inner layer of this follicle
the cement is formed. This substance, therefore, unlike the dentine,
increases from within outwards, and its growth may accordingly be the
cause of considerable modification of form and enlargement, especially
of the roots, of certain teeth, as those of Seals and some Cetacea. The
delicate homogeneous layer coating the enamel surface of newly-formed
teeth, in which cement is not found in the adult state, and known as
Nasmyth’s membrane, is considered by Tomes as probably a film of this
substance, too thin to exhibit its characteristic structure, though
by others it is believed to be derived from the external layer of the
enamel-organ. The homology of the teeth with the dermal appendages,
hairs, scales, and claws, has already been alluded to, and it will now
be seen that in both cases two of the primary embryonic layers are
concerned in their development—the mesoblast and epiblast—although in
very different proportions respectively. Thus in the hair or nail the
part derived from the epiblast forms the principal bulk of the organ, the
mesoblast only constituting the papilla or matrix. But in the tooth the
epiblastic portion is limited to the enamel, and is always of relatively
small bulk and often absent, while the dentine (the principal constituent
of the tooth) and the cement are formed from the mesoblast.
When more than one set of teeth occur in mammals, those of the second
set are developed in a precisely similar manner to the first, but the
enamel-germ, instead of being derived directly from an independent
part of the oral epithelium, is formed from a budding out of the neck
of the germ of the tooth succeeded. In the case of the true molars,
which have no predecessors, the germ of the first has an independent
origin, but that of the others is derived from the neck of the germ of
the tooth preceding it in the series. The foundations of the permanent
teeth are thus laid as it were almost simultaneously with those of their
predecessors, although they remain in many cases for years before they
are developed into functional activity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account