An introduction to the study of mammals living and extinctLydekker, Richard
Science
An introduction to the study of mammals living and extinct
Lydekker, Richard
Mammals
With regard to the lower teeth the difficulties are greater, owing to the
absence of any suture corresponding to that which defines the incisors
above; but since the number of the teeth is the same, the corresponding
teeth are preceded by milk-teeth, and in the large majority of cases it
is the fourth tooth of the series which is modified in the same way as
the canine (or fourth tooth) of the upper jaw, it is quite reasonable
to adopt the same divisions as with the upper series, and to call the
first three, which are implanted in the part of the mandible opposite
to the premaxilla, the incisors, the next the canine, the next four the
premolars, and the last three the molars. It may be observed that when
the mouth is closed, especially when the opposed surfaces of the teeth
present an irregular outline, the corresponding upper and lower teeth
are not exactly opposite, otherwise the two series could not fit into
one another; but as a rule the points of the lower teeth shut into the
interspaces in front of the corresponding teeth of the upper jaw. This
is seen very distinctly in the canine teeth of the Carnivora, and is a
useful guide in determining the homologies of the teeth of the two jaws.
Objections have certainly been made to this view, because, in certain
rare cases, the tooth which, according to it, would be called the lower
canine has the form and function of an incisor (as in Ruminants and
Lemurs), and on the other hand (as in _Cotylops_, an extinct Ungulate
from North America) the tooth that would thus be determined as the
first premolar has the form of a canine; but it should not be forgotten
that, as in all such cases, definitions derived from form and function
alone are quite as open to objection as those derived from position and
relation to surrounding parts, or still more so.
_Dental formulæ._—For the sake of brevity the complete dentition,
arranged according to these principles, is often described by the
following formula, the numbers above the line representing the teeth of
the upper, those below the line those of the lower jaw:—incisors ³⁻³⁄₃₋₃,
canines ¹⁻¹⁄₁₋₁, premolars ⁴⁻⁴⁄₄₋₄, molars ³⁻³⁄₃₋₃ = ¹¹⁻¹¹⁄₁₁₋₁₁; total
44. Since, however, initial letters may be substituted for the names of
each group, and it is quite unnecessary to give more than the numbers
of the teeth on one side of the mouth, the formula may be conveniently
abbreviated into—
_i_ ³⁄₃, _c_ ¹⁄₁, _p_ ⁴⁄₄, _m_ ³⁄₃ = ¹¹⁄₁₁; total 44.
The individual teeth of each group are always enumerated from before
backwards, and by such a formula as the following—
_i_ 1, _i_ 2, _i_ 3, _c_, _p_ 1, _p_ 2, _p_ 3, _p_ 4, _m_ 1, _m_ 2, _m_ 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_i_ 1, _i_ 2, _i_ 3, _c_, _p_ 1, _p_ 2, _p_ 3, _p_ 4, _m_ 1, _m_ 2, _m_ 3
or more briefly—
1,2,3 1 1,2,3,4 1,2,3
_i_ ------ _c_ -- _p_ -------- _m_ -----.
1,2,3, 1, 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account