If the children were too young to be intrusted with the management of
their own affairs, these were turned over to a guardian, the nearest
relation. He gave the children to their mothers to bring up, because
according to their usage the mother has no power of her own. When the
guardian was the brother of the deceased [the children's paternal
uncle] they take the children from their mother. These guardians give
what was intrusted to them to the heirs when they come of age, and not
to do so was considered a great dishonesty and was the cause of much
contention.... If when the lord died there were no sons [ready, i. e.,
of age] to rule and he had brothers, the oldest or most capable of his
brothers ruled, and they [the guardians] showed the heir the customs
and fetes of his people until he should be a man, and these brothers,
although the heir were [ready] to rule, commanded all their lives, and,
if there were no brothers the priests and principal people selected a
man suitable for the position.[14]
The foregoing would seem to imply that the rulers were succeeded by their
eldest sons if the latter were of age and otherwise generally acceptable;
and that, if they were minors when their fathers died, their paternal
uncles, if any, or otherwise some capable man selected by the priests, took
the reins of government, instructing the heir in the duties of the position
which he was to occupy some day; and finally that the regent did not lay
down his authority until death, even though the heir had previously
attained his majority. This custom is so unusual that its existence may
well be doubted, and it is not at all improbable that Bishop Landa's
statement to the contrary may have arisen from some misapprehension.
Primogeniture was not confined to the executive succession alone, since
Bishop Landa states further that the high priest _Ahau can mai_ was
succeeded in his dignity by his sons, or those next of kin.
Nepotism doubtless prevailed extensively, all the higher offices of the
priesthood as well as the executive offices being hereditary, and in all
probability filled with members of the halach uinic's family.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account