An introduction to the theory of value : $b On the lines of Menger, Weiser, and Böhm-Bawerk — John Shaqi
An introduction to the theory of value : $b On the lines of Menger, Weiser, and Böhm-BawerkSmart, William
General
An introduction to the theory of value : $b On the lines of Menger, Weiser, and Böhm-Bawerk
Smart, William
Austrian school of economics; Value
Value, then, is a much less comprehensive conception, and does not
emerge till a certain limitation is put upon this utility. But the
limitation in question is not an arbitrary one. To drain a river of a
few hundred gallons, or even to drain it all but a few hundred gallons,
will not necessarily give the remainder any value. To change utility
into value there must be, not only a capability of satisfying want, but
a felt dependence of some want on the particular good containing the
utility. The relation of value to utility, in fact, may be described
as the relation of a positive condition to a capability. As capable
of quenching thirst, all water is useful, but it does not obtain any
value till some limitation of the available quantity makes it the
indispensable _condition_ of a satisfaction. The water led into a city
may come from a stream which, as a whole, flows to the sea unvalued,
but, in the city, it conditions the wellbeing of thousands of people,
and obtains a value from the satisfaction of wants that are conditioned
by it.
If, then, the distinction between Value and Utility, which seems
essential to clearness of thinking, is to be maintained, it will be by
attaching the former to an indispensable and felt condition, the latter
to a general capability of ministering to human wellbeing.
Thus we may say that, while utility is the importance which a good
possesses as generally _capable_ of ministering to the wellbeing of
a subject, Value is the importance which a good possesses as the
_indispensable condition_ of the wellbeing of a subject. Or more
fully: Value is the importance which a good acquires as the recognised
condition of something that makes for the wellbeing of a subject,
and would not be obtainable without the good.[8] It cannot be too
firmly grasped then, that the relation between utility and value is
_quantitative_, and that the same thing may or may not have value
according to change of circumstances, or difference in points of view
and comparison.
[8] Menger’s definition is “Die Bedeutung, welche concrete Güter oder
Güterquantitäten für uns dadurch erlangen, das wir in der Befriedigung
unserer Bedürfnisse von der Verfügung über dieselben abhängig zu sein
uns bewusst sind.”—_Grundzüge_, p. 78.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account