An open verdict : $b a novel, volume 2 (of 3) — John Shaqi
An open verdict : $b a novel, volume 2 (of 3)Braddon, M. E. (Mary Elizabeth)
General
An open verdict : $b a novel, volume 2 (of 3)
Braddon, M. E. (Mary Elizabeth)
English fiction -- 19th century
Did he believe her guilty of that last and worst of crimes, the murder
of a father? Hardly. But he was not fully assured of her innocence. His
mind had been racked with doubt--ever since that day of the inquest
when he had stood in the doorway and watched her agonized face and
listened to her faltering words. There is nothing that the human
mind more unwillingly believes than a strange coincidence; and that
coincidence of Miss Harefield’s purchase of the laudanum within a week
of her father’s death by laudanum had been too much for Cyril’s faith.
Had his beloved been a penniless orphan, and no worldly gain to be had
from loving her, he might have reconciled his doubt with his honour
and married her, trusting to time for the elucidation of the mystery
that now stained her young life with the taint of possible guilt. But
in this case there was too much for him to win--and in every feeling
that drew him to Beatrix he recognised a snare of Satan. Little by
little he had come to know that public opinion in Little Yafford--and
even in the neighbouring town of Great Yafford--had condemned Beatrix
Harefield. Every detail of her conduct had been canvassed. Her late
appearance on the morning of her father’s death was taken as an
evidence of guilt. She had feared to face the catastrophe her crime
had brought about, and had feigned sleep to stave off the appalling
moment. Or she had simulated that heavy slumber in order to support
her story about the laudanum. Her suggestion that her father should be
sought for in a certain room, and the fact that he was found in that
very room; her lame story--obviously an after thought--of the laudanum
bottle in her mother’s room--all told against her. The fact that an
empty bottle had been found there proved nothing. Beatrix had no doubt
placed it where it was found. There had been ample time for her to do
so between the first and second meetings of the coroner’s jury. Then as
to motive? Well, one need not look very far for that, argued Little
Yafford. Mr. Harefield had been a tyrant, and had made his daughter’s
life miserable. She saw in his death a release from his tyranny, with
the assurance of wealth and independence. Everybody knew--thanks to
Mrs. Dulcimer--how cruelly the wretched girl had been treated, even
forbidden to visit the Vicarage, where she had always been so happy.
And then there was that secret love affair which had been spoken about
at the inquest. That would give a still stronger motive than her own
wrongs. The more cultured inhabitants of Little Yafford, gentlemen who
had dipped into old magazines and Annual Registers, quoted the case of
Miss Blandy, an unfortunate young woman in the last century, who had
given Henley-on-Thames, the place of her birth and residence, a classic
fame by poisoning her father with ratsbane mixed in his water gruel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account