An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
Suppose you had accidentally found a very small Part of a visibly
broken Medallion, with nothing more express upon it, than what is
represented at _Fig._ 1. _Plate_ I. a Person totally unacquainted with
the mathematical Sciences, we may naturally conclude, would not be able
to make any thing of it, or in the least comprehend what it originally
was, or meant; but if an Astronomer should chance to see it, who of
course we are to suppose knew the Order and Proportion of the planetary
Orbits, he would immediately conclude, and with great Probability,
on the Side of his Conjectures, that it might be Part of a Medal
representing the Solar System. In such a Case may we not very naturally
suppose he would reason thus?
The Arches A and B seem to be Portions of the respective Orbits of
_Saturn_ and _Jupiter_, and what may lead us to believe, that they are
really so, and Part of the Solar System, is the oblique Curve C, which
looks not unlike the Trajectory of a Comet.
This surely would be far from an irrational Conjecture, and
consequently in some Degree probable: But this is not sufficient you'll
say; To prove it we must have farther recourse to the Mathematicks, and
a Mathematician would immediately thus demonstrate it to be true.
[Illustration: Plate I.]
[Illustration: Plate II.]
First, by compleating the Circles geometrically from the fourth Book of
_Euclid_, by the Assistance of any three Points E. F. G. the original
Figure will be restored, as at _Fig. 2._ And secondly, by assuming
any two Points, as F, E in the Curve C, if admitted a Parabola, by a
well-known Problem in Conic Sections the Heliocentric Portion X. Y.
Z. will easily be projected and shewn, as in _Fig. 3._ Lastly, join
this in Position to the former, and it will justly supply the Orbit,
or Path of some one of the Comets; and if required, even what Comet
may be discovered by comparing the Perihelion Distance Y. S. with
their general Elements or Theories, in Dr. Hally's _Synopsis_ of the
Motion of these Bodies. And if a farther Confirmation of the Truth
of these Conjectures were wanting, the small concentric Circles at D
would now be allowed beyond a Contradiction, to represent the secondary
Orbits of _Saturn_; and thus the first Presumption being carried thro'
several corroborating Degrees of Probability, almost past a Dispute,
would become a mathematical Certainty; and the above imperfect Piece
of Medallion, would evidently appear beyond a Contradiction to be Part
of a Representation of the said solar System, and such as is shewn in
_Plate_ II. Q. E. D. Thus in many Cases, it often happens, that from
a very small Part of _orbicular Things_, we are able to determine
the Form and Direction of the Whole: And hence you may conceive it
no very difficult Task to a Mathematician, to describe the Orbits of
all the Planets in the solar System, though he had never observed
them but in one and the same Sign of the _Zodiack_; thus far I have
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account