An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ... — John Shaqi
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
I may, I think, suppose, that you know so much of Opticks as to
understand, that all visible Objects apparently decrease in Magnitude,
as their Distance from the Eye increases. Consequently, that, if the
Moon's Orbit was placed as far again from the Earth as it really is,
her Globe, or rather _Disk_, would then seem to be but half as big
as to us she now appears to be, and of course still farther, were
she placed at ten times the Distance she is known to revolve at, her
apparent Diameter would be reduced to a tenth Part only of what it now
appears to be in her present Orbit, that is, one hundred Times less
in visible Magnitude than her neighbouring Disk is found to be where
it now is seen. And such, but something less, the two Planets _Venus_
and _Jupiter_, which are frequently, in their Turns, our Morning and
Evening Stars, appear to be through a common Telescope.
Now these two Planets, together with the other three, which we find
moving in regular Orbits round the Sun, are all found subject to the
same [N]Changes of _Phænomena_, in their various Aspects with the Sun;
and who can doubt but that they are all of the same or like Nature? But
you'll say, perhaps, how are we sure that _Venus_ and _Jupiter_ have no
native Light of their own, since many of the ancient Philosophers, and
in particular _Anaximander_, allowed even the Moon to have some; and
besides, in Philosophy, as well as in Logick, I think you hold there is
no proving a Negative, at least at such a Distance.
[Footnote N: _Venus_ and _Mercury_ in every Heliocentrick Revolution,
perform all the Changes of our Moon in a like Gradation and Defection
of Light, both horned and gibos'd.]
To make you conceive the Impossibility of such a Light, and next
to a Demonstration, convince you of the Unnaturalness of such a
Supposition, I must put you in mind, that some time ago, when I was
last in the Country with you, I think it was about the latter End of
Autumn, near the Winter Solstice, as we were walking one Evening, I bid
you take notice of the Moon, which was then near setting, and about
two Days old. You may remember, her whole Globe appeared to us very
conspicuously within a manifest Circle. You immediately told me, that
that kind of Phænomenon the Country People called a _Stork_, or the old
Moon in the new one's Arms. This I then endeavoured to explain to you,
and I think made you sensible it was intirely an Effect of the Earth's,
and an Appearance always to be expected at that Time of the Year. The
Earth being then in the State of a Full-Moon to that Part of the lunar
Orbit, and near her Perihelion, at which time, the Earth sends back a
Reflection to the [O]Moon twenty-five times more potent than that of
the Moon to us.
[Footnote O: Their Diameters being nearly as 1 to 5.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account