An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ... — John Shaqi
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
You tell me you begin to be a tolerable good _Copernican_, and would
now be glad to have my Opinion further upon the Nature of the Sun and
Stars, with regard to the Suggestion of their being like Bodies of
Fire. This you say will go a great Way towards confirming you in the
Notion you have begun to embrace of a Plurality of Systems, and a much
greater Multiplicity of Worlds than our little solar System can admit
of. Besides, shewing in a very evident Light, that the Authorities
cited in my first Letter are founded upon the clearest Reason.
_Anaxagoras_, you say, believed the Sun to be a Lump of red-hot
Iron; _Euripides_ thought it a Clod of Gold; and others still more
ridiculously have imagined it to be a dark Body, void of all Heat.
That the Sun is a vast Body of blazing Matter, notwithstanding the
various Opinions of those primitive Sages, will, I think, hardly admit
of a Question: Since the known Warmth of his prolifick Beams, and the
visible Effect of the Burning-glass, puts it quite out of the Power
of our present Set of Senses, at least to argue against it; and how
reasonably we may imagine the Stars to be all of the same or like
Nature, will sufficiently appear from these following Considerations:
First, it is well known to all Mathematicians, that any visible Object
of any determined Magnitude may be reduced to the Appearance of [P]a
physical Point, by removing the Eye of the Observer to a proper or
proportionable Distance from it, within the finite View: And that the
apparent Diameter of every luminous celestial Body, will always be
diminished reciprocally, in Proportion to the Distance from the Eye,
till they become altogether imperceptible.
[Footnote P: What is here meant by a physical Point, is a Point visible
to the naked Eye, which human Art cannot divide; and so far it partakes
of the Property of a mathematical one, which is only to be conceived,
and not seen.]
Thus the Disk of the Sun, which appears to us at Earth under an Angle
of about half a Degree, if seen from the Planet _Saturn_, would appear
not much bigger than the Planet _Venus_ or _Jupiter_, in their most
neighbouring Vicinity does to us; and consequently to an Eye placed
in the Aphelion Point of the Orbit of the great _Comet_ of 1680, his
apparent Diameter would be so reduced as to seem but little bigger than
the largest of the Stars; and by the same Analogy, or Way of Reasoning,
admitting Space and Distance infinite, which I humbly apprehend is
not to be disputed, were all the Matter in the Universe united, and
conglobed in one Mass, with respect to ocular Sensation, it might be
diminished so near to a mathematical Punctum, as to be almost adequate
to our Ideas of Nothing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account