An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
Resplendent Sparks of the first Fire!
In which the Beauty we admire,
And Light of those eternal Rays,
The uncreated Mind displays.
[Footnote S: Mr. _Bradley_, Astronomer-Royal, has, in a great measure,
proved that the Aberration of the Stars hitherto mistaken for a
Parallax, may arise from, and indeed seems to be no other than the
progressive Motion of Light, and Change of Place to the Eye, arising
from the Earth's annual Motion and Direction.]
It remains now I think to shew, and endeavour to prove, that the Stars
are not only light Bodies of the Nature of the Sun, but that they are
really so many Suns, all performing like Offices of Heat and Gravity,
in a regular Order, throughout the visible Creation, in opposition to
an Opinion you have formerly hinted at, of their being in another
Sense of a secondary Nature.
All Objects within the sensible Sphere of the Sun's Attraction, or
Activity, are in some measure magnified by a good Telescope: But the
Stars are all placed so far without it, that the best Glasses has no
other Effect upon them than making them appear more vivid or lively,
but all innate opaque Bodies, reflecting only a borrowed Light from
some primary one, contrary to this Property, are all observed to lose
their Light, in the same Proportion, as they are magnified, and through
all Glasses become more dull than otherwise they appear to the naked
Eye: And hence we may infer, without any further Evidence, that the
Stars are all light Bodies endowed with native Lustre; and that Bodies,
like the known Planets, from the same Reasoning, it is as clear they
cannot be, because their Distance, though uncertain as to the Truth of
the whole, yet such a Part of it as cannot be denied, would render them
all in such a Case invisible.
A Proof of this will plainly present itself, if we consider the Course
of the known Comets, who all of them, without Exception, become
imperceptible, and intirely disappear; though most of them much bigger
than the Earth, or any of the lesser Planets, long before they arrive
at their respective Aphelions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account