An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...Wright, Thomas
Philosophy
An original theory or new hypothesis of the universe: $b founded upon the laws of nature, and solving by mathematical principles the general phænomena of the visible creation; and particularly the via lactea ...
Wright, Thomas
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
But to infer from their Appearance only, that they are really Stars,
without considering their Nature and Distance; and that nothing but
Stars could possibly produce such an Effect, may perhaps be assuming
too much, when we have nothing but the bare Credit of the _Belgic_
Glasses to support our Conjectures; and although this may be sufficient
for any Mathematician, yet for your greater Satisfaction, I have
thought proper to give two or three more evincing Arguments, to confirm
these important Discoveries. _Democritus_, as I have said before,
believed them to be Stars long before Astronomy reaped any Benefit from
the improved Sciences of Optics; and saw, as we may say, through the
Eye of Reason, full as far into Infinity as the most able Astronomers
in more advantageous Times have done since, even assisted with their
best Glasses: And his Conjectures are almost as old as the philolaic
System of the Planets itself; the Construction of which, though
attempted by many, none have ever yet been able to confute.
The Light which naturally flows from this Crowd of radiant Bodies
is mixt and confused, chiefly occasioned by the Agitation of our
Atmosphere, and from a Union of their Rays of Light, by a too near
Proximity of their Beams, altogether they appear like a River of Milk,
but more of a pelucid Nature, running all round the starry Regions.
[Illustration: Plate XIV.]
For in the azure Skies its candid Way
Shines like the dawning Morn, or closing Day.
There are also many more such luminous Spaces to be found in the
Heavens of the same Nature with these, which we know to be Stars; in
particular the _Nebulæ_, or cloudy Star in the _Præsepe_ of 36; a
cloudy Star in _Orion_ of 21; [AC]a cloudy [AD]Knot not far from this
in the same Asterism of 80; in one Degree of the same Constellation
500, and in the whole Form above [AE]2000. All of which are great
Confirmations of the Truth of our Assertion, _i. e._ that this Zone of
Light proceeds from an infinite Number of small Stars. Here it will
not be amiss to observe, that it has been conjectured, and is strongly
suspected, that a proper Number of Rays, meeting from different
Directions, become Flame; and that hence it may prove not the Sun's
real Body which we daily see, but only his inflamed Atmosphere. I
begin to be of Opinion, and I think not without Reason, that the true
Magnitude of the Sun is not near what the modern Astronomers have made
it; and that it may not possibly be much above two Thirds of what it
appears to us; I don't mean that this Expansion of the solar Flame is
any Part of that dilated Light mentioned by Sir _Isaac Newton_, and
conceived to be round all light Bodies in general; but you may consider
it as not much differing from it, not of an unlike Nature, only greater
in Degree, and peculiar to the Sun and Stars, who are all, as has been
before in a manner demonstrated to be actually Globes of Fire.
[Footnote AC: Vide _Galilæo_]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account